Triumph Street Cup 2017 vs. Yamaha XSR700 2016

Triumph Street Cup 2017

Triumph Street Cup 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2016

Yamaha XSR700 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Cup 2017 vs Yamaha XSR700 2016

The Triumph Street Cup 2017 and the Yamaha XSR700 2016 are both naked bikes that offer a combination of style, performance, and comfort.

In terms of engine specifications, the Triumph Street Cup is equipped with an in-line crankpin offset engine that delivers 55 horsepower and 80 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR700 features an in-line engine that produces 75 horsepower and 68 Nm of torque. While the Yamaha XSR700 has a slightly more powerful engine, the Triumph Street Cup compensates with its torque-strong and elastic engine, providing a responsive and enjoyable riding experience.

Both motorcycles are equipped with fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient performance and engine temperature regulation. They also have 2 cylinders and a steel frame chassis, providing stability and durability on the road.

Triumph Street Cup 2017

Triumph Street Cup 2017

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions at the rear. However, the Yamaha XSR700 is equipped with a monoshock rear shock absorber, while the Triumph Street Cup has dual shocks. This difference in suspension design may result in a slightly different riding experience, with the Yamaha offering a more direct and responsive feel, and the Triumph providing a smoother and more comfortable ride.

Both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front, but there are some differences in the specifications. The Triumph Street Cup has larger diameter disks (310 mm) and double piston calipers, while the Yamaha XSR700 has slightly smaller diameter disks (282 mm) and four piston calipers. These differences may result in variations in braking performance, with the Triumph potentially offering stronger stopping power.

Both bikes are equipped with ABS, providing advanced rider assistance systems for improved safety on the road.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha XSR700 has a slightly larger front tire width (120 mm) compared to the Triumph Street Cup (100 mm). The rear tire width of the Yamaha is also wider (180 mm) compared to the Triumph (150 mm). However, the Triumph Street Cup has a larger front tire diameter (18 inch) compared to the Yamaha (17 inch). Both motorcycles have the same rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The Yamaha XSR700 has a slightly shorter wheelbase (1405 mm) compared to the Triumph Street Cup (1435 mm). The seat height of the Yamaha is higher (815 mm) compared to the Triumph (780 mm). Additionally, the Yamaha XSR700 has a larger fuel tank capacity (14 liters) compared to the Triumph Street Cup (12 liters).

Yamaha XSR700 2016

Yamaha XSR700 2016

In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Cup is praised for its stunning looks, torque-strong and elastic engine, and sporty yet comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR700 is commended for its elastic motor, direct transmission, easy handling, and good build quality.

As for weaknesses, the Triumph Street Cup's electronics do not remember if the traction control was deactivated after switching off the ignition. The Yamaha XSR700, on the other hand, is criticized for having a too soft chassis and a seating position that may require some getting used to.

In summary, both the Triumph Street Cup 2017 and the Yamaha XSR700 2016 offer unique features and strengths. The Triumph Street Cup stands out with its stunning looks, torque-strong engine, and comfortable seating position, while the Yamaha XSR700 impresses with its elastic motor, direct transmission, and easy handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Cup 2017 compared to Yamaha XSR700 2016

Triumph Street Cup 2017
Yamaha XSR700 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn line crankpin offsetEngine typeIn line
BoreBore84.6 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke80 mmStroke68.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power55 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power5,900 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpm
TorqueTorque80 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque3,230 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.55 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears5Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement900 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
TravelTravel120 mmTravel130 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberDual ShockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel120 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
RakeRake65.7 degreeRake65.5 degree
TrailTrail98.7 mmTrail90 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter282 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter255 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter18 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth740 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,105 mmHeight1,130 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height780 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Cup 2017

Triumph Street Cup 2017

Beautiful retro racer. Lots of riding fun, little fear. Not a killer naked, but definitely strong in battle if you are swing-oriented.

Stunning looks

torque-strong, very elastic engine

sporty yet comfortable seating position

Electronics do not remember that you deactivated the traction control after switching off the ignition

Yamaha XSR700 2016

Yamaha XSR700 2016

The XSR is the perfect everyday bike for me. It is visually a feast for the eyes, has an incredible amount of power, but is still light and agile. The seating position allows longer rides, as the luggage can be carried on the back without any problems. The XSR itself doesn't know exactly what it wants to be now. But I find the resulting mix quite exciting. So if you don't want to (or can't) have different bikes in the garage, the XSR is a very good choice. served very well. It has everything you expect from a motorbike. In a hotel, one would speak of an all-inclusive offer. It is perfect for It is perfect for the daily ride to the office, for weekend excursions and smaller tours to the south. Even with a pillion, the bike is very easy to move. As usual from Yamaha, the bike makes a very solid impression. Everything simply works here. The exhaust is pleasantly quiet, but from 5000 rpm it produces a very appealing and throaty sound. The rear end is a matter of taste. Personally, I would rebuild the rear and remove the plastic elements. I also find the standard mirrors a little large. The retro look was not quite carried through here. However, this can be changed very quickly and easily thanks to the many accessories. The instrument panel is basically easy to read. However, a lot of information is space. Here, design and functionality clash a little. Summarised in one sentence: The perfect bike for every challenge.

Wonderful engine

Solid workmanship

Cool retro look

Large range of original accessories

Great automatic gearshift

Sporty, tight chassis

Easy to drive

Joy dispenser for young and old alike

Readability of the display

licence plate holder a matter of taste

lack of consistency in some design details

concept-related poor wind protection when driving fast

Price Comparison Average Market Price Triumph Street Cup vs Yamaha XSR700

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Cup 2017 and a Yamaha XSR700 2016. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR700 with 85 days compared to 112 days for the Triumph Street Cup. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 4 reviews for the Triumph Street Cup and 26 reviews for the Yamaha XSR700 since model year 2015. The first review for the Triumph Street Cup was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 36,100 views. This compares to more than 13,700 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR700 published on 7/22/2015.

Price Triumph Street Cup

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR700

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons