Husqvarna SM 510R 2011 vs. Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 510R 2011 vs Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 510R 2011 compared to Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Husqvarna SM 510R 2011
Husqvarna SM 630 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore100 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke76.4 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.4
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement600 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandMarzocchi

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandMarzocchi

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight120.5 kgDry Weight142.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH