KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 vs. BMW R 1250 RS 2019

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 vs BMW R 1250 RS 2019

The KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 and the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 are both sport touring motorcycles that offer a combination of sporty performance and comfortable long-distance riding capabilities.

In terms of engine and drive train, the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 is equipped with a V-twin engine that delivers 173 HP of power and 144 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 features a boxer engine that produces 136 HP of power and 143 Nm of torque. Both bikes have a 2-cylinder, 4-stroke engine configuration and a displacement of over 1200cc. The KTM has a chain transmission, while the BMW has a prop shaft transmission.

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a single swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The KTM has a front suspension travel of 125 mm and a rear suspension travel of 156 mm, while the BMW has a front suspension travel of 140 mm and a rear suspension travel of 140 mm. The KTM offers adjustment options for compression, preload, and rebound, while the BMW only offers adjustment options for preload and rebound.

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

In terms of chassis, the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 has a steel frame. The KTM has a tubular frame type, while the BMW has a load-bearing engine frame type.

Both motorcycles are equipped with double disc brakes at the front, with radial technology for the KTM and standard for the BMW. In terms of assistance systems, both bikes come with ABS, but the BMW also includes anti-slipping control, riding modes, and ride by wire technology.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, while the BMW has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm. Both motorcycles have a 17-inch front and rear tire diameter. The KTM has a wheelbase of 1482 mm and a seat height of 835 mm, while the BMW has a wheelbase of 1530 mm and a seat height of 820 mm. The KTM has a larger fuel tank capacity of 23 liters compared to the BMW's 18 liters.

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

In terms of equipment, the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 comes with an adjustable windscreen, while the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 features LED headlights as standard.

The KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016's strengths lie in its extensive standard equipment, sensational engine performance, unique design, and uncomplicated pannier system. However, it has weaknesses in terms of poor wind protection, manual windshield adjustment, and relatively high fuel consumption.

On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 RS 2019 offers precise and stable handling, an agile high-revving boxer engine, a modern look, and a seating position suitable for touring. It also comes with ABS and traction control as standard, selectable riding modes, a color TFT display, LED headlights, and an extensive accessories list. However, it has a weakness in the form of a windshield that could be higher and many features that come at an extra cost.

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 compared to BMW R 1250 RS 2019

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016
BMW R 1250 RS 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeVEngine typeBoxer
BoreBore108 mmBore102.5 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke76 mm
Engine powerEngine power173 HPEngine power136 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque144 NmTorque143 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.2 Compression Ratio12.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid-air
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement1,254 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel125 mmTravel140 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSingle swing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel156 mmTravel140 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeLoad-bearing engine
RakeRake65.1 degreeRake62.3 degree

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes, Ride by Wire

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,530 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity23 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentWindscreen adjustableEquipmentLED-Headlights

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016

With generous standard equipment, a retuned engine and unmistakably edgy KTM design, the 1290 Super Duke GT aims to enter the sport touring segment. With rideable performance and the full power of the naked bike in the spirit of the "Ready-to-Race" credo, it stands out from the competition not only visually. The mattighofen sports fanatics even fit heated grips and cruise control to offer frequent riders a nice spot. Somehow they still manage to remain credible and to trigger storms of enthusiasm in the rider.

extensive standard equipment

sensational engine

unique design

uncomplicated pannier system

Poor wind protection

manual windshield adjustment

quite high fuel consumption

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

BMW R 1250 RS 2019

Visually, the new BMW R 1250 RS is the only one of the five big boxers that has really undergone major changes. This is very fitting, because the new ShiftCam engine with its wonderful sovereignty from the rev range has changed the character, and the RS is now an even better tourer. It is still not a light, compact motorbike, but it offers wonderful stability and comfort, only the wind protection could be a little better. But sportiness is not neglected either, the enormously powerful boxer engine is extremely agile. As usual, the Bavarians are excellent at offering an attractive list of accessories, from which some features play a decisive role in the good performance: The ESA suspension should not be missing for frequently changing load conditions (passenger, luggage), and for the ultimate driving pleasure, the shift assistant Pro is a must.

Precise and stable handling

agile, high-revving boxer engine

modern look

seating position suitable for touring

ABS and traction control standard

selectable riding modes

colour TFT display and LED headlights standard

extensive accessories list

Windshield could be higher

many features at extra cost

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke GT vs BMW R 1250 RS

There are a few key differences between a KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 and a BMW R 1250 RS 2019. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1250 RS 2019 is about 43% higher. A KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 experiences a loss of 710 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 260 USD for a BMW R 1250 RS 2019. Compared to BMW R 1250 RS 2019 there are more KTM 1290 Super Duke GT 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 13 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1250 RS with 76 days compared to 106 days for the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT and 11 reviews for the BMW R 1250 RS since model year 2019. The first review for the KTM 1290 Super Duke GT was published on 11/17/2015 and now has more than 23,600 views. This compares to more than 77,400 views for the first review on BMW R 1250 RS published on 11/6/2018.

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1250 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH