Husqvarna FC 350 2017 vs. Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna FC 350 2017 vs Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FC 350 2017 compared to Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore88 mm
StrokeStroke57.5 mmStroke57.4 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.5 Compression Ratio12.9
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears5Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement349.7 ccmDisplacement349.1 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height992 mmSeat Height940 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight106.4 kgDry Weight113 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.5 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

The Husqvarna FC 350 offers a successful overall package that differs from the identically constructed KTM 350 EXC-F in the details. The powerful unit impresses with clean power, even when the engine has to be kept at high revs. In terms of handling, the fork of the Husqvarna FC 350 dips too much, which makes the ride a little angular. The brakes, on the other hand, are easy to apply, even if the pressure point is very tight.

Good traction

brakes with good dosing

Fork dips too far

narrow brake pressure point

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Beta RR 350 4T 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FC 350 vs Beta RR 350 4T

Price Husqvarna FC 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta RR 350 4T

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH