Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have inline engines with three cylinders and liquid cooling. However, there are some differences in their power and torque outputs. The Yamaha MT-09 has an engine power of 115 HP and a torque of 87.5 Nm, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a higher engine power of 123 HP but a lower torque of 77 Nm.

In terms of fuel system, both bikes have fuel injection. They also have similar suspension systems, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with a monoshock at the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame.

When it comes to brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, but the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a larger diameter of 310 mm compared to the 298 mm of the Yamaha MT-09.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes have ABS and traction control. However, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS offers additional features such as riding modes, ride by wire, and a quickshifter.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. The Yamaha MT-09 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the 1410 mm of the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS. The seat height of the Yamaha MT-09 is 815 mm, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a slightly higher seat height of 825 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the Yamaha MT-09 is 14 liters, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS has a larger capacity of 17.4 liters.

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 has several strengths, including an Öhlins suspension that provides excellent performance, an Akrapovic exhaust system that enhances both the look and sound of the bike, and a Magura HC3 radial brake pump that offers exceptional braking performance. The Carbon2Race covers also add to the bike's aesthetics. Additionally, the combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is highly effective.

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has its own set of strengths. It has a wonderfully sporty engine that delivers thrilling performance, and a quickshifter that allows for seamless gear changes. The bike also has a throaty sound, an excellent braking system, and ABS and traction control that can be switched off for a more dynamic riding experience. The Triumph Street Triple 765 RS also has a cool and stylish look, and its low weight contributes to its agile handling.

However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 can be a financial burden due to the additional costs of upgrading certain parts. Additionally, some of the modifications, such as the ECU flash, may not be road legal. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 has a complicated menu navigation system, which may be a drawback for some riders.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 are powerful and capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2017 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017
Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power123 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque10,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel115 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel131 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake66.1 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter310 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017

The top model among the Street Triples fully deserves the designation. Sportier in all respects than the R version, the RS presents itself on the country road as a fun machine that has few opponents to fear. Trackdays on the racetrack are also an issue, especially since the engine is very sharp, the Brembo brakes are super-sporty and the suspension with the Öhlins damper is wonderfully precise. The handling is a stunner anyway, the Street Triple is still the lightest in its class. The standard quickshifter further consolidates the position of the top model.

wonderfully sporty engine

quickshifter as standard

throaty sound

excellent braking system

ABS and traction control as standard and can be switched off

cool looks

low weight

complicated menu navigation

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2017 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 is about 4% higher. A Yamaha MT-09 2017 experiences a loss of 810 USD in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 20 USD for a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017. Compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 RS 2017 there are more Yamaha MT-09 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 RS with 67 days compared to 73 days for the Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 26 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 RS since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 RS published on 1/10/2017.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 RS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH