KTM 150 XC-W 2017 vs. Husqvarna CR 125 2013

KTM 150 XC-W 2017

KTM 150 XC-W 2017

Husqvarna CR 125 2013

Husqvarna CR 125 2013

Loading...

Overview - KTM 150 XC-W 2017 vs Husqvarna CR 125 2013

KTM 150 XC-W 2017

KTM 150 XC-W 2017

Husqvarna CR 125 2013

Husqvarna CR 125 2013

Technical Specifications KTM 150 XC-W 2017 compared to Husqvarna CR 125 2013

KTM 150 XC-W 2017
Husqvarna CR 125 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore58 mmBore54 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width100 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height100 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,471 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height985 mm

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 150 XC-W 2017

KTM 150 XC-W 2017

There is no longer a 200 EXC with road approval. Like the 125, the 150 is no longer available as a road-legal EXC but as an XC-W, i.e. a cross-country machine with a long (wide) sixth gear. New 2017: E-starter series! The "+" and "-" here should be seen in relation to the other KTMs.

E-starter series. Big plus compared to the 125

Easier to ride than the 125

More forgiving but still great handling

Cheap to buy and maintain.

Like the 125cc, more a motorbike for connoisseurs and experts

Challenging power delivery

Demanding handling in low-traction conditions.

Husqvarna CR 125 2013

Husqvarna CR 125 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons