KTM 790 Duke 2018 vs. Yamaha XSR700 2017

KTM 790 Duke 2018

KTM 790 Duke 2018

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Loading...

Overview - KTM 790 Duke 2018 vs Yamaha XSR700 2017

The KTM 790 Duke 2018 and the Yamaha XSR700 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and cooling systems. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 790 Duke 2018 has a significant advantage with 105 HP compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2017's 75 HP. This means that the KTM offers more powerful acceleration and a livelier ride.

Both bikes have two cylinders and use injection fuel systems. They also have similar suspension setups, with telescopic forks in the front and swing arms with monoshock absorbers in the rear. However, the KTM 790 Duke 2018 has an upside-down telescopic fork in the front, which may provide better handling and stability.

The chassis of the KTM 790 Duke 2018 is made of chromium-molybdenum, while the Yamaha XSR700 2017 has a steel frame. The chromium-molybdenum frame of the KTM is likely to be lighter and more rigid, which can contribute to better handling and performance.

Both bikes have double disk brakes in the front with four pistons, providing strong and reliable stopping power. The KTM 790 Duke 2018 has slightly larger front brake disks with a diameter of 300 mm compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2017's 282 mm.

KTM 790 Duke 2018

KTM 790 Duke 2018

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the KTM 790 Duke 2018 offers more features. It has ABS, riding modes, and traction control, while the Yamaha XSR700 2017 only has ABS.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the KTM 790 Duke 2018 has a longer wheelbase of 1475 mm compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2017's 1405 mm. This longer wheelbase may contribute to better stability and handling.

The seat height of the KTM 790 Duke 2018 is slightly higher at 825 mm compared to the Yamaha XSR700 2017's 815 mm. This may make the KTM slightly less accessible for shorter riders.

Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, providing a decent range for long rides.

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2017

In terms of strengths, the KTM 790 Duke 2018 is praised for its lively and high-revving engine, powerful acceleration, and optimally tuned chassis for sporty riding. It also has many electronic gimmicks and functions, including a precise quickshifter that makes fast riding easier. Additionally, it offers a comfortable seating position.

The Yamaha XSR700 2017 is praised for its wonderful engine, solid workmanship, and cool retro look. It also has a large range of original accessories and a great automatic gearshift. The sporty and tight chassis make it easy to drive and enjoyable for riders of all ages.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 790 Duke 2018 is criticized for its rough handling at low revs and its performance in city traffic. Some riders also find the switches on the handlebars to be fiddly-looking. Additionally, there have been reports of oil leaks at the engine block on many 790 Dukes.

The Yamaha XSR700 2017 is criticized for the readability of its display and the design of its license plate holder, which is a matter of taste. Some riders also find that there is a lack of consistency in some design details. Additionally, the concept of the bike leads to poor wind protection when driving at high speeds.

Overall, the KTM 790 Duke 2018 offers more power, advanced rider assistance systems, and a more precise quickshifter. It also has a longer wheelbase and a higher seat height. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR700 2017 has a wonderful engine, a cool retro look, and a great automatic gearshift. It also has a slightly shorter wheelbase and a lower seat height.

Technical Specifications KTM 790 Duke 2018 compared to Yamaha XSR700 2017

KTM 790 Duke 2018
Yamaha XSR700 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore88 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke65.7 mmStroke68.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power105 HPEngine power75 HP
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement799 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
TravelTravel140 mmTravel130 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel150 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
RakeRake66 degreeRake65.5 degree

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter282 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 790 Duke 2018

KTM 790 Duke 2018

The KTM 790 Duke L is an absolutely sporty naked bike with a high fun factor. Whether a beginner rider can handle it depends very much on his or her personality and riding behaviour. There are certainly motorbikes better suited for learning, but sporty radius hunters will hardly be satisfied with anything else. The 790 Duke L is also rather unenthusiastic about everyday rides in the city. On the country road, however, it's a blast, even with only 48 hp. Simply a fun bike as it is written in the book.

Lively, high-revving engine with powerful acceleration

optimally tuned chassis for sporty riding

awesome sound even with series muffler

many electronic gimmicks and functions

extremely precise quickshifter that makes fast riding even easier

comfortable seating position

Rough handling at low revs

bitchy in city traffic

sometimes fiddly-looking switches on the handlebars

oil leak at the engine block on many 790 Dukes

Yamaha XSR700 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2017

The XSR is the perfect everyday bike for me. It is visually a feast for the eyes, has an incredible amount of power, but is still light and agile. The seating position allows longer rides, as the luggage can be carried on the back without any problems. The XSR itself doesn't know exactly what it wants to be now. But I find the resulting mix quite exciting. So if you don't want to (or can't) have different bikes in the garage, the XSR is a very good choice. served very well. It has everything you expect from a motorbike. In a hotel, one would speak of an all-inclusive offer. It is perfect for It is perfect for the daily ride to the office, for weekend excursions and smaller tours to the south. Even with a pillion, the bike is very easy to move. As usual from Yamaha, the bike makes a very solid impression. Everything simply works here. The exhaust is pleasantly quiet, but from 5000 rpm it produces a very appealing and throaty sound. The rear end is a matter of taste. Personally, I would rebuild the rear and remove the plastic elements. I also find the standard mirrors a little large. The retro look was not quite carried through here. However, this can be changed very quickly and easily thanks to the many accessories. The instrument panel is basically easy to read. However, a lot of information is space. Here, design and functionality clash a little. Summarised in one sentence: The perfect bike for every challenge.

Wonderful engine

Solid workmanship

Cool retro look

Large range of original accessories

Great automatic gearshift

Sporty, tight chassis

Easy to drive

Joy dispenser for young and old alike

Readability of the display

licence plate holder a matter of taste

lack of consistency in some design details

concept-related poor wind protection when driving fast

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 790 Duke vs Yamaha XSR700

There are a few key differences between a KTM 790 Duke 2018 and a Yamaha XSR700 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 790 Duke 2018 is about 19% higher. A KTM 790 Duke 2018 experiences a loss of 580 USD in one year and 900 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 110 USD and 780 USD for a Yamaha XSR700 2017. Compared to Yamaha XSR700 2017 there are more KTM 790 Duke 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 24 compared to 7. It takes less time to sell a KTM 790 Duke with 58 days compared to 91 days for a Yamaha XSR700. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 35 reviews for the KTM 790 Duke and 26 reviews for the Yamaha XSR700 since model year 2015. The first review for the KTM 790 Duke was published on 11/9/2016 and now has more than 160,600 views. This compares to more than 13,700 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR700 published on 7/22/2015.

Price KTM 790 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR700

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH