BMW S 1000 RR 2014 vs. BMW K 1300 S 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2014

BMW K 1300 S 2016
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2014 compared to BMW K 1300 S 2016
BMW S 1000 RR 2014
BMW K 1300 S 2016
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 80 mm | Bore | 80 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 49.7 mm | Stroke | 64.3 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 192 HP | Engine power | 175 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 13,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,250 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 112 Nm | Torque | 140 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 9,750 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 8,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 13 | Compression Ratio | 13 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Prop shaft |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Displacement | Displacement | 999 ccm | Displacement | 1,293 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Strut |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Single swing arm |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube | Frame type | Twin Tube, Load-bearing engine |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Fixed caliper | Shock mount | Fixed caliper |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Double piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 190 mm | Rear tyre width | 190 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,056 mm | Length | 2,182 mm |
Width | Width | 826 mm | Width | 905 mm |
Height | Height | 1,138 mm | Height | 1,221 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,432 mm | Wheelbase | 1,585 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 820 mm | Seat Height | 820 mm |
Dry Weight | Dry Weight | 183 kg | Dry Weight | 228 kg |
Kerb Weight | Kerb Weight | 204 kg | Kerb Weight | 254 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW S 1000 RR 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2015 buyers are closer than ever to a World Superbike Championship machine and will be able to ride it faster than ever before.
Powerful engine
superior electronics package
superb shift assistant
versatile for track and road use
despite high performance, a bike that is easy to ride.
In the fully equipped version, the price skyrockets
stability is a bit tricky
packages subject to surcharges are put together with a focus on profit maximisation and not with a focus on customer benefits.
BMW K 1300 S 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs BMW K 1300 S
Price BMW S 1000 RR
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW K 1300 S
Model year
Current average market prices