Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Kawasaki Z1000 2013

When comparing the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2013, it is clear that both naked bikes have their own unique strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016, it boasts a powerful engine with 149 horsepower and 106 Nm of torque. This provides the rider with ample power and acceleration. The bike also features a liquid-cooled, in-line four-cylinder engine, which helps to maintain optimal engine temperature during long rides. Additionally, the GSX-S1000 has a displacement of 999cc, allowing for smooth and effortless cruising.

In terms of suspension, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork in the front, which can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. This allows for a customizable and comfortable ride. The rear suspension also offers adjustment options for preload and rebound. The chassis of the GSX-S1000 is made of aluminum, providing a lightweight yet sturdy frame. The frame type is a twin tube, further enhancing the bike's stability and handling.

When it comes to braking, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 features double disk brakes in the front with four pistons. The technology used is radial, which improves braking control and responsiveness. This ensures the rider can confidently and safely come to a stop when needed.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a front tire width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width is 190mm with a diameter of 17 inches as well. The wheelbase measures 1460mm, providing stability and balance. The seat height is 815mm, offering a comfortable riding position for most riders. The fuel tank capacity is 17 liters, allowing for longer rides without the need for frequent refueling.

Moving on to the Kawasaki Z1000 2013, it also boasts a powerful engine with 138 horsepower and 110 Nm of torque. The bike features a liquid-cooled, in-line four-cylinder engine, similar to the GSX-S1000. The displacement of the Z1000 is slightly smaller at 1043cc, but still provides a thrilling riding experience.

In terms of suspension, the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork in the front, which can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. This allows for a customizable and comfortable ride, similar to the GSX-S1000. The rear suspension also offers adjustment options for compression, preload, and rebound.

The chassis of the Z1000 is made of aluminum, providing a lightweight and durable frame. The frame type is a double cradle, which may result in a slightly more nervous and less stable ride compared to the twin tube frame of the GSX-S1000.

When it comes to braking, the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 features double disk brakes in the front with four pistons. The technology used is radial and petal, which improves braking control and responsiveness. This ensures the rider can confidently and safely come to a stop when needed, similar to the GSX-S1000.

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 has a front tire width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width is 190mm with a diameter of 17 inches as well. The wheelbase measures 1440mm, slightly shorter than the GSX-S1000. The seat height is 815mm, offering a comfortable riding position for most riders. The fuel tank capacity is 15 liters, slightly smaller than the GSX-S1000.

In terms of strengths, both bikes have powerful engines that provide exhilarating rides. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has the advantage of good braking control, a stable and sensitive chassis, a comfortable seating position, and a relatively low price. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013, on the other hand, has the advantage of a rich sound and a unique design.

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a front end that looks too good, which may be subjective to individual preferences. It also has a throttle response in the lower rev range that some riders may find to be too aggressive. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013 lacks traction control, which may be a downside for riders who prioritize safety. Additionally, the Z1000 has a slightly more nervous chassis compared to the GSX-S1000.

Overall, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 are powerful naked bikes with their own unique features and characteristics. Riders should consider their individual preferences and priorities when choosing between the two.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power138 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,600 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque110 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio11.8
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,043 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountdirect
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Petal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth805 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

All in all, the new Z1000 is a successful further development of its predecessor. The lack of traction control is more of a marketing problem than a problem for end customers.

Powerful engine

rich sound

unique design

No traction control

nervous chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Kawasaki Z1000

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Kawasaki Z1000 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is about 5% higher. A Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 experiences a loss of 90 USD in one year and 1,330 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 730 USD and 730 USD for a Kawasaki Z1000 2013. Compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2013 there are more Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z1000 with 69 days compared to 109 days for the Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 41 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 9/27/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 5,800 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z1000 published on 9/2/2002.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH