Beta RR 50 Factory 2013 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2011

Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Husqvarna TE 250 2011

Husqvarna TE 250 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta RR 50 Factory 2013 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2011

Beta RR 50 Factory 2013
Husqvarna TE 250 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore40.3 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke39 mmStroke1,000 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.6
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement49.7 ccmDisplacement250 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,415 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height935 mmSeat Height950 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight85 kgDry Weight106 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity6.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 50 Factory vs Husqvarna TE 250

Price Beta RR 50 Factory

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons