Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2021 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2021 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several differences between the two models that should be considered.

In terms of engine performance, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 comes with a four-cylinder engine that delivers 125.4 HP of power and 98.6 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 features a three-cylinder engine with 118 HP of power and 77 Nm of torque. Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling.

When it comes to suspension, both bikes are equipped with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arms at the rear. The Kawasaki Z900 2021 offers preload and rebound adjustment for both the front and rear suspension, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 provides compression, preload, and rebound adjustment for both the front and rear suspension.

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of chassis, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 features a steel frame with a double cradle design, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons, but the Kawasaki Z900 2021 has 300 mm diameter disks compared to the 310 mm diameter disks on the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017. The brakes on the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 also utilize radial and monoblock technology.

Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. They also have similar tire dimensions and wheelbase measurements. However, there are slight differences in seat height, with the Kawasaki Z900 2021 having a seat height of 795 mm compared to the 825 mm seat height of the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017.

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 offers a powerful four-cylinder engine, intuitive handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 boasts a powerful powertrain, decent torque, great sound, super brakes, sufficient comfort, a color TFT display, the ability to switch off ABS, standard traction control, a lightweight design, and an independent look.

However, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 does have some weaknesses, such as the lack of a quickshifter option and the presence of competitors with more advanced electronically controlled 6-axis IMU systems. Similarly, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 has a slightly rougher throttle response and may be considered to have a noticeable distance from the top model RS in terms of features and performance.

In conclusion, while both the Kawasaki Z900 2021 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 offer exciting riding experiences, they have distinct differences in terms of engine performance, suspension, chassis, and strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2021 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2021
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power118 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel115 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel134 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake66.1 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height825 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, except for the lack of a quickshifter option.

powerful four-cylinder

intuitive handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

No quickshifter option

competitors with 6-axis IMU electronically ahead.

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

The golden mean of the three Street Triple Schwesetern S, R and RS inspires with balanced riding performance - not too comfortable but far enough away from the top model RS. The engine characteristics aim for a bulbous middle in the rev range and exude a lot of charisma - among other things because of the unique sound. In terms of handling, there is hardly anything better; the Street Triple is the lightest in its class. For smaller riders, there is a version with a low seat height, and for A2 licence holders, there is a variant with 95 hp that can easily be throttled down to 48 hp.

powerful powertrain

decent torque

great sound

super brakes

sufficiently comfortable

colour TFT display

ABS can be switched off

traction control standard

very light

independent look

Slightly rougher throttle response

noticeable distance to the top model RS

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2021 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 33. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 R with 86 days compared to 107 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 15 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 R published on 1/10/2017.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH