Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height885 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight121 kgDry Weight120.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

In everyday use, experienced pilots immediately feel at ease and have a lot of fun zipping through the traffic. However, inexperienced pilots are somewhat overwhelmed by the spontaneous and sporty characteristics.

Supermoto geometry

handy chassis

high performance

rev-happy engine

Bicycle speedometer looks a bit rancid

reliability

not suitable for everyday use

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2011

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH