Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height885 mmSeat Height870 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight121 kgDry Weight113.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005

In everyday use, experienced pilots immediately feel at ease and have a lot of fun zipping through the traffic. However, inexperienced pilots are somewhat overwhelmed by the spontaneous and sporty characteristics.

Supermoto geometry

handy chassis

high performance

rev-happy engine

Bicycle speedometer looks a bit rancid

reliability

not suitable for everyday use

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons