Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

The Suzuki GSX-S1000 model year 2016 and the Suzuki GSX-S750 model year 2017 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both bikes have an inline four-cylinder engine with fuel injection and liquid cooling. The GSX-S1000 has a larger displacement of 999cc compared to the GSX-S750's 749cc. This results in the GSX-S1000 having more power with 149 horsepower compared to the GSX-S750's 114 horsepower. The GSX-S1000 also has more torque with 106 Nm compared to the GSX-S750's 81 Nm.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The GSX-S1000 offers more adjustability with preload and rebound adjustments at the rear, while the GSX-S750 only has preload adjustment.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, providing stability and a responsive ride. The braking systems are also similar, with double disc brakes at the front and a diameter of 310mm. However, the GSX-S1000 has four-piston calipers at the front, while the GSX-S750 has double piston calipers.

Both bikes are equipped with ABS, providing advanced rider assistance systems for enhanced safety. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are also similar, with a front tire width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width is slightly different, with the GSX-S1000 having a width of 190mm and the GSX-S750 having a width of 180mm. The wheelbase of the GSX-S1000 is slightly longer at 1460mm compared to the GSX-S750's 1455mm. The seat height of the GSX-S750 is slightly higher at 820mm compared to the GSX-S1000's 815mm.

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

In terms of strengths, the GSX-S1000 has a more powerful engine and good braking control. It also has a stable and sensitive chassis and a comfortable seating position. Additionally, the GSX-S1000 is relatively affordable compared to other bikes in its class. On the other hand, the GSX-S750 has a GSX-R 750 engine with a strong character, powerful and well-controlled brakes, and a harmonious design. It also has a more affordable price and a sharp sound. The GSX-S750 offers great lean angle clearance, allowing for more aggressive cornering.

However, there are some weaknesses to consider. The GSX-S1000's front end may look too good for some riders, and it has been noted to have a slightly toxic throttle response in the lower rev range. The GSX-S750 has an acute knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders. Additionally, the tachometer on the GSX-S750 can be difficult to read in certain lighting conditions.

In conclusion, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 are both powerful naked bikes with similar technical specifications. The GSX-S1000 offers more power and adjustability, while the GSX-S750 has a more affordable price and a sharper sound. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 compared to Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Suzuki GSX-S750 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Suzuki GSX-S750 2017
Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power114 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque81 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio12.3
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
Can be restricted for A2 licenceCan be restricted for A2 licenceCan be restricted for A2 licenceYes
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement749 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel138 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter240 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,125 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth785 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,455 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height820 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

More power, more performance, more sound. Suzuki also proves all the pessimists regarding the EURO4 standard wrong and delivers the GSX-S 750, a successor to the GSR 750 that has been further developed in every respect and can be a bit more serious, but doesn't have to be. To ensure that aha moments don't become oje moments, ABS and a three-stage traction control that can be switched off provide a safety cushion. With S21 tyres from Bridgestone, the GSX-S is super-sporty, allowing you to take advantage of the generous lean angle clearance. Only the acute knee angle could be a disadvantage on longer tours.

GSX-R 750 engine with strong character

powerful, well-controlled brakes

harmonious design

affordable price

sharp sound

great lean angle clearance

acute knee angle

tachometer difficult to read

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Suzuki GSX-S750

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Suzuki GSX-S750 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is about 17% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 there are less Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 14. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki GSX-S750 with 84 days compared to 109 days for the Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 14 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S750 since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 9/27/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 50,800 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S750 published on 10/4/2016.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S750

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen