Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg TE 300 2012 vs Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 300 2012 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg TE 300 2012
Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement293.2 ccmDisplacement293 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight103 kgDry Weight103 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 300 2012

Husaberg TE 300 2012

The TE 300 was and remains a favourite, even in the new generation. Whether it's a special stage, narrow forest trials or endless steep slope climbs, the TE300 is never out of place. Simply a bike with which you can't go wrong.

Very wide range of applications

simple but solid two-stroke technology.

none

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH