Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs. Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2018 vs Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

The Kawasaki Z900 model year 2018 and the Kawasaki Z900 70kW model year 2020 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an in-line engine with a displacement of 948ccm and a liquid cooling system. The engine power of the Z900 2018 is 125.4 HP, while the Z900 70kW 2020 has a slightly lower power of 95 HP. The torque of the Z900 2018 is 98.6 Nm, whereas the Z900 70kW 2020 has a torque of 91.2 Nm.

Both models have a double cradle steel frame and similar suspension systems. The front suspension consists of an upside-down telescopic fork with preload and rebound adjustment, while the rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock and preload and rebound adjustment. The rear suspension material is aluminum in both models.

In terms of braking, both models have double disk brakes with a diameter of 300 mm and four pistons. The braking technology is petal in both cases. Additionally, both models are equipped with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

The dimensions and weights of the two models are also identical. They both have a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, with a diameter of 17 inches for both front and rear tires. The wheelbase is 1450 mm and the seat height is 795 mm. The kerb weight, including ABS, is 210 kg for both models.

Now let's compare the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The Kawasaki Z900 2018 is praised for its powerful and silky engine, great sound, and sharp, sporty look. It also has a low seating position, which contributes to easy handling and maneuverability.

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 is considered to have enough power, even with throttle restrictions. It is also praised for its great handling, good equipment, and aggressive look. Many riders also find it to be a good value for money.

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

However, the Z900 2018 does have some weaknesses. It lacks traction control, which can be a disadvantage in certain riding conditions. Additionally, tall riders may find the knee angle strenuous in the long run.

As for the Z900 70kW 2020, some riders find the menu navigation somewhat tiring, which can be a minor inconvenience. Another drawback is the missing quickshifter option, which could enhance the overall riding experience.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z900 2018 and the Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 are powerful naked bikes with similar technical specifications. While the Z900 2018 has a more powerful engine and a sportier look, the Z900 70kW 2020 offers good power and handling, along with additional features such as riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2018 compared to Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2018
Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque91.2 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel140 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake65 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail105 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2018

In the hotly contested naked bike segment, the Z900 plays right at the front. Above all, its engine is absolutely terrific, runs incredibly silky and offers rich power in all rev regions - as befits a Japanese four-cylinder. Its sporty, aggressive appearance matches this. It does without electronic bells and whistles, but still conveys a lot of confidence when chasing corners, braking and accelerating out of them. The low seat is especially beneficial for smaller riders, but taller riders might miss a flatter knee angle on long distances. The low weight and compactness make the Z900 particularly agile and easy to handle. A sporting cannon that is also extremely appealing in terms of price

Powerful and silky engine

great sound

chassis

sharp, sporty look

low seating position

easy handling and manoeuvrability.

Lack of traction control

Knee angle strenuous for tall riders in the long run

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Whether you ride it with 70 kW, or in a further throttled 35 kW version: The Kawasaki Z900 is on a par with its open version - just with less power. That's why you can also be happy about the great handling and the updated electronics package for 2020. There's also good news about the engine. Even with 95 hp, the Kawa pulls tight on the chain and will give pleasure for many seasons! A bike you can grow with!

Enough power - even with throttle

great handling

good equipment

aggressive look

value for money.

Menu navigation somewhat tiring

missing quickshifter option

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Kawasaki Z900 70kW

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2018 and a Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2018 is about 2% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 55 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 112 days compared to 197 days for a Kawasaki Z900 70kW. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 10 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 70kW since model year 2018. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 104,300 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 70kW published on 11/23/2018.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900 70kW

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH