BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
BMW S 1000 R 2015
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2015 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
The BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and displacement. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a higher horsepower of 160 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 which has 135 HP. This means that the BMW S 1000 R 2015 offers more power and acceleration, making it a more thrilling ride.
When it comes to torque, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has 112 Nm while the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has 111 Nm. Although the difference is minimal, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 may have a slight advantage in terms of torque, providing better low-end power and acceleration.
Both bikes have a similar number of cylinders, with the BMW S 1000 R 2015 having 4 cylinders and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 having 3 cylinders. The additional cylinder in the BMW S 1000 R 2015 may contribute to its higher power output.
In terms of suspension, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, while the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a telescopic fork. The upside-down telescopic fork on the BMW S 1000 R 2015 may provide better stability and control during aggressive riding.
BMW S 1000 R 2015
Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, which offers good rigidity and stability. This contributes to the overall handling and performance of the bikes.
In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. However, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 also features radial and monoblock technology, which may provide better braking performance and control.
Both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter, offering similar grip and handling characteristics. The wheelbase of the two bikes is also similar, with the BMW S 1000 R 2015 having a slightly longer wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the 1435 mm of the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012.
When it comes to seat height, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a lower seat height of 814 mm compared to the 825 mm of the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. This may make the BMW S 1000 R 2015 more accessible to riders with shorter inseams.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
In terms of weight, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a slightly lower kerb weight of 207 kg compared to the 212 kg of the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. This may contribute to better agility and maneuverability for the BMW S 1000 R 2015.
Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters, offering a similar range before needing to refuel.
In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 has a powerful and well controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comparatively comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a flawless racing chassis, precise handling, stable brakes, and inspiring looks.
However, the BMW S 1000 R 2015 also has some weaknesses, including expensive optional extras, a hard chassis, and vibrations in the handlebars. The Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has weaknesses in terms of requiring wide radii for turns and lacking in comfort.
Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2015 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are powerful and capable naked bikes, but they have their own unique strengths and weaknesses that may appeal to different riders based on their preferences and riding style.
Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2015 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW S 1000 R 2015
With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
The R rides as precisely and calmly as never before. It is guaranteed to keep its nerve even when the rider may have long since thrown it away. The disadvantage of the compact powerhouse is that the radii have to be a little wider and the course a little faster so that the true Queen of England can also play the 4 aces up her sleeve.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Triumph Speed Triple R
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2015 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 12. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 61 days compared to 78 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.
