BMW R 1200 GS 2013 vs. Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2015

BMW R 1200 GS 2013

Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2015
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 GS 2013 compared to Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2015
BMW R 1200 GS 2013
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2015
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | Boxer | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 101 mm | Bore | 85 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 73 mm | Stroke | 71.4 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 125 HP | Engine power | 137 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,700 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 125 Nm | Torque | 121 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 6,500 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,400 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.5 | Compression Ratio | 12 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Antihopping | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Prop shaft | Transmission | Prop shaft |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 3 |
Cooling | Cooling | Air | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 1,170 ccm | Displacement | 1,215 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Strut | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjustment | Adjustment | Preload | Adjustment | Preload |
Suspension Rear
Adjustment | Adjustment | Preload | Adjustment | Preload |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube, Load-bearing engine | Frame type | Tubular |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 110 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 80 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 19 inch | Front tyre diameter | 19 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 170 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,207 mm | Length | 2,248 mm |
Width | Width | 953 mm | Width | 885 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,507 mm | Wheelbase | 1,530 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 850 mm | Seat Height | 840 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 238 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 267 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 20 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW R 1200 GS 2013

There are hardly any real points of attack in the market leader, which has become even more versatile - and faster.
New engine
Top chassis
High comfort
Suitable for travelling
Suitable for everyday use
Nix
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2015

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 GS vs Triumph Tiger Explorer XC
Price BMW R 1200 GS
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Triumph Tiger Explorer XC
Model year
Current average market prices