BMW R 1200 GS 2005 vs. Kawasaki Z 400 2019

BMW R 1200 GS 2005

BMW R 1200 GS 2005

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 GS 2005 compared to Kawasaki Z 400 2019

BMW R 1200 GS 2005
Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power98 HPEngine power45 HP
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement399 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,519 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height840 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 GS 2005

BMW R 1200 GS 2005

Either it was a stroke of luck or the best developers were at work - handlebars, geometry, seat, knee angle, footrests - it just fits really well for the majority of Central Europeans. All in all, there is still no motorbike that can kill the GS.

Optimal wind protection

comfortable seat

good posture

positive ergonomics

weather robust

quiet chassis.

Seat a little too low.

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

Kawasaki Z 400 2019

The Kawasaki Z400 is definitely a great evolution of its predecessor, the Z300. More power, less weight - all around, simply an even better bike. Above all, the linear power delivery and excellent handling make the Z400 an ideal entry-level bike. The ease of clutch operation and good chassis set-up are also in this vein, which is why the Z400 can be recommended to novice riders without hesitation.

Great, very controllable power delivery

Low weight

Good seating position

Great sound

Very suitable for novice riders.

Non-adjustable clutch and brake levers

Limited adjustable chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 GS vs Kawasaki Z 400

Price BMW R 1200 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons