BMW K 1300 R 2016 vs. BMW R 1200 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW R 1200 R 2016

BMW R 1200 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW K 1300 R 2016 vs BMW R 1200 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW R 1200 R 2016

BMW R 1200 R 2016

Technical Specifications BMW K 1300 R 2016 compared to BMW R 1200 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016
BMW R 1200 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeBoxer
BoreBore80 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke64.3 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power172 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque140 NmTorque125 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,293 ccmDisplacement1,170 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionStrutFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionParalever

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,228 mmLength2,165 mm
WidthWidth856 mmWidth880 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,585 mmWheelbase1,515 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height790 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW R 1200 R 2016

BMW R 1200 R 2016

The predecessor was already able to be ridden in a sporty manner as well as convincing on tours, the new R 1200 R can do even more - thanks to the pannier system (of course at extra cost), travelling is still no problem, but it masters sport even better. Thanks to the now partially water-cooled boxer twin-cylinder engine, it is wonderfully agile - 125 hp may not seem like much on paper, but the engine pushes incredibly and behaves in a cultivated manner to boot. The chassis and brakes also score highly and the seating position is sporty and upright, covering a wide spectrum from wonderful fun to long-distance touring. Unfortunately, BMW also understands the trick with the surcharge list perfectly. The basic model is well equipped with ABS that can be deactivated, traction control that can also be deactivated and two driving modes, but many interesting gimmicks are almost obligatory - and of course drive the price way up.

Sporty look

powerful engine

good sound, comfortable seating position

ABS and traction control standard

two riding modes

Many cool features only available at extra cost

poorly readable rev counter

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW K 1300 R vs BMW R 1200 R

Price BMW K 1300 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1200 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH