Yamaha WR 250X 2012 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha WR 250X 2012

Yamaha WR 250X 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha WR 250X 2012 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha WR 250X 2012

Yamaha WR 250X 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Technical Specifications Yamaha WR 250X 2012 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha WR 250X 2012
Yamaha MT-09 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore77 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke53.6 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power31 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque23.7 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement250 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width130 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth810 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,190 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,425 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height895 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.6 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha WR 250X 2012

Yamaha WR 250X 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Riding fast is possible, but exhausting. The high handlebars are counterproductive on the race track and require a lot of physical effort. The MT-09 can't keep up with the Street Triple R, even with WP suspension.

Powerful engine with plenty of torque

Fine control of traction control

No blipper function

High handlebars give little feedback

Rough throttle response

Early-regulating ABS

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha WR 250X vs Yamaha MT-09

Price Yamaha WR 250X

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons