KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2011

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2011

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019
BMW S 1000 RR 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore108 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power177 HPEngine power192 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpm
TorqueTorque144 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.2 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,432 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2019

The epithet "Beast" is not completely out of the blue, the KTM is and remains a brutal naked bike - 177 hp from two pots with a combined displacement of 1301 cubic metres is nothing harmless. Nevertheless, it is surprisingly easy to control; the upright seating position combined with the good handling make it seem almost docile. Compared to its predecessor, it has been improved precisely at its weakest points. The engine now runs more smoothly, the shift assistant brings calmness in the acceleration phase and the chassis has been improved in quality. But it still loves the wild chase more than high speed in long curves.

Provides a wonderful adrenaline rush

extensive configuration options

terrific brakes with cornering ABS

practical electronic features

great seating position

electronic features can be set very sporty and also deactivated

very good shift assistant

Precise stroke not always easy to hit

one of the most dangerous motorbikes for the driving licence on the market

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

The most important changes to the S 1000 RR, however, were the numerous small adjustments to the chassis and geometry. Here we now benefit from thousands of test kilometres from the BMW test crew. This is logical evolution and a great step forward.

Improved driveability - optimised torque curve

plenty of power

strong engine

good traction point

immaculately functioning shift assist.

Accelerating load is very fatiguing.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R vs BMW S 1000 RR

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons