Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and cooling systems. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 has a significant advantage with 114 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 72 HP. This means that the Suzuki model offers a more powerful and potentially faster riding experience.

The torque of the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 is also higher at 81 Nm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 64 Nm. This means that the Suzuki model will have better acceleration and pulling power.

Another difference is the number of cylinders. The Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 has 4 cylinders, while the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 has only 2 cylinders. More cylinders generally result in smoother power delivery and better overall performance.

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

In terms of suspension, both models feature a monoshock rear shock absorber. This type of suspension offers good stability and control, providing a comfortable and smooth ride.

The chassis of the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 is made of aluminum, while the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 has a steel frame. Aluminum frames are generally lighter and offer better handling and maneuverability.

Both models have double disk brakes at the front with double piston calipers. This ensures strong and reliable braking performance for both bikes.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 has a slightly wider front tire at 120 mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 120 mm front tire. The rear tire width of the Suzuki model is also wider at 180 mm compared to the Kawasaki model's 160 mm rear tire. The wheelbase of the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 is longer at 1455 mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 1410 mm wheelbase. The seat height of the Suzuki model is also higher at 820 mm compared to the Kawasaki model's 805 mm seat height. In terms of weight, the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 213 kg compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013's 204 kg kerb weight.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 has a GSX-R 750 engine with a strong character, powerful and well-controlled brakes, a harmonious design, an affordable price, a sharp sound, and great lean angle clearance. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling and high-quality level.

However, the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 does have some weaknesses. Some riders may find the knee angle to be acute, which could be uncomfortable for longer rides. Additionally, the tachometer may be difficult to read for some riders.

The Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 has a weakness in its brakes, which are considered to be weak compared to the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017.

In conclusion, the Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 offers more power, better torque, and a slightly more advanced design compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. However, the Kawasaki model is praised for its solid handling and high-quality level. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore72 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke46 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power114 HPEngine power72 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque81 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.3 Compression Ratio10.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement749 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typePerimeter

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,125 mmLength2,110 mm
WidthWidth785 mmWidth770 mm
HeightHeight1,055 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,455 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height805 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight213 kgKerb Weight204 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

Suzuki GSX-S750 2017

More power, more performance, more sound. Suzuki also proves all the pessimists regarding the EURO4 standard wrong and delivers the GSX-S 750, a successor to the GSR 750 that has been further developed in every respect and can be a bit more serious, but doesn't have to be. To ensure that aha moments don't become oje moments, ABS and a three-stage traction control that can be switched off provide a safety cushion. With S21 tyres from Bridgestone, the GSX-S is super-sporty, allowing you to take advantage of the generous lean angle clearance. Only the acute knee angle could be a disadvantage on longer tours.

GSX-R 750 engine with strong character

powerful, well-controlled brakes

harmonious design

affordable price

sharp sound

great lean angle clearance

acute knee angle

tachometer difficult to read

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S750 vs Kawasaki ER-6n

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S750 2017 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 14. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 84 days for the Suzuki GSX-S750. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 14 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S750 and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S750 was published on 10/4/2016 and now has more than 50,800 views. This compares to more than 11,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 6/29/2005.

Price Suzuki GSX-S750

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH