Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 vs. Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016

Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 vs Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

When comparing the Suzuki GSX-S1000F model year 2016 and the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT model year 2021, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the technical specifications, both motorcycles have an inline engine type and chain transmission. However, there are some differences in their engine power and torque. The Suzuki GSX-S1000F has a more powerful engine with 149 HP and 106 Nm of torque, while the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT has 119 HP and 93 Nm of torque. In terms of engine displacement, the Suzuki has a larger engine with 999 ccm compared to the Yamaha's 890 ccm.

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a monoshock at the rear. However, the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT has a slightly higher travel in both the front (130 mm) and rear (137 mm) suspension compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000F's 120 mm and 130 mm respectively. Both motorcycles offer adjustment options for compression, preload, and rebound.

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016

When it comes to the chassis, both motorcycles have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. This provides a strong and lightweight structure for better handling and stability.

In terms of brakes, both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front. The Suzuki GSX-S1000F has larger diameter disks (310 mm) compared to the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT (298 mm). Both motorcycles also come with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

Moving on to the dimensions and weights, the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT has a slightly larger wheelbase (1500 mm) compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000F (1460 mm). The seat height of the Yamaha is also slightly lower at 810 mm compared to the Suzuki's 815 mm. Both motorcycles have similar tire widths and diameters, with the Yamaha having a slightly narrower rear tire (180 mm) compared to the Suzuki (190 mm). The Yamaha Tracer 9 GT also has a larger fuel tank capacity at 19 liters compared to the Suzuki's 17 liters. In terms of weight, the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 220 kg compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000F's 214 kg.

Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Now, let's consider the strengths and weaknesses of each motorcycle. The Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 is praised for its top exciting engine, strong Brembo brakes, great accessories, and fine traction control. However, it is criticized for having ABS that is not sporty enough, limited wind protection, and a slightly acute knee angle.

On the other hand, the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021 is praised for its GT variant with great standard equipment, powerful engine with great tuning, easy handling, stable ride, comprehensive electronics package, great e-chassis, good wind protection, great pillion comfort, and long range. However, it is criticized for having a poorly readable and illogical display, stationary noise over 95 dB, a somewhat rough clutch, and moderate responsiveness.

In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 and the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a more powerful engine and better wind protection, while the Yamaha provides a more comprehensive electronics package and better pillion comfort. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 compared to Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016
Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power119 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement890 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel137 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,175 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth885 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height810 mm
Seat Height up toSeat Height up to815 mmSeat Height up to815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)214 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)220 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016

The GSX-S1000F is basically a GSX-S1000 with which it shares all the geometry, with a bit of added value that pays off quite well. More stability at higher speeds, more wind protection and overall more compatible with the engine's character. The GSX-R engine is still a force, even if it has run out of juice a bit down low. Suzuki also offers a great price/performance ratio here.

top exciting engine

strong brembo brakes

great accessories

fine traction control.

ABS not sporty enough

wind protection limited

knee angle a little too acute

Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021

Yamaha impressively proves how wonderfully emotional a practical motorbike can be. Again and again you laugh mischievously into your helmet when you let the husky three-cylinder off the leash. An all-round successful motorbike that can replace half a motorbike garage. Unfortunately, the attempt with the unconventional display was a failure. It is impractical and difficult to read.

GT variant with great standard equipment

powerful and powerful engine with great tuning

easy handling

stable ride

comprehensive electronics package

great e-chassis

good wind protection

great pillion comfort

long range

Poorly readable and illogical display

stationary noise >95 dB (96 dB)

somewhat rough clutch

moderate responsiveness

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000F vs Yamaha Tracer 9 GT

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 and a Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021 is about 27% higher. A Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 experiences a loss of 400 USD in one year and 1,320 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 USD and 460 USD for a Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021. Compared to Yamaha Tracer 9 GT 2021 there are less Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 25. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha Tracer 9 GT with 84 days compared to 140 days for the Suzuki GSX-S1000F. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 10 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000F and 17 reviews for the Yamaha Tracer 9 GT since model year 2021. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000F was published on 9/30/2014 and now has more than 13,100 views. This compares to more than 61,200 views for the first review on Yamaha Tracer 9 GT published on 11/8/2020.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha Tracer 9 GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH