BMW S 1000 R 2017 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2017 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

In terms of technical specifications, both the BMW S 1000 R 2017 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 have similar engine types, engine power, torque, fuel system, cylinders, cooling, and displacement. They both have in-line engines with 4 cylinders and liquid cooling, and their engine displacements are 999cc.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and has a twin tube frame.

Both bikes also have double disk brakes with four pistons and radial technology for the front brakes.

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 1460mm. The seat height of both bikes is similar, with the BMW S 1000 R 2017 having a seat height of 814mm and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 having a seat height of 815mm. The BMW S 1000 R 2017 has a slightly lower kerb weight of 205kg (with ABS) compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 209kg (with ABS). Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters, with the BMW S 1000 R 2017 having a slightly larger capacity of 17.5 liters.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike.

The BMW S 1000 R 2017 has several strengths. It is known for having the best shift assistant in the nakedbike league, providing smooth and precise gear shifts. It is a universal motorbike without any real weaknesses, offering a great balance between power, handling, and sound. The bike has a powerful engine and produces an awesome sound. It also has great handling capabilities. However, on the racetrack, some riders may find the riding position slightly too inactive. The BMW S 1000 R 2017 offers a very wide range of equipment and accessory options, allowing riders to customize their bike to their preferences. The bike also has very powerful brakes and a semi-active suspension system, which eliminates the need for manual setup adjustments.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 also has its strengths. It has a powerful engine and provides good braking control. The bike has a stable and sensitive chassis, offering a comfortable riding experience. It also has a relatively low price compared to other bikes in its class.

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 does have a few weaknesses. The original equipment tires may not be of the finest premium quality. Additionally, the riding position on the racetrack may feel too inactive for some riders.

Similarly, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a couple of weaknesses. The front end of the bike may look too good for some riders' preferences. It also has a toxic throttle response in the lower rev range, which may require some adjustment from the rider.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2017 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2017
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power149 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)205 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)209 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW's universal talent also got better in 2017. The BMW offers the widest range of use and an exceptionally cultivated engine, a perfect gearbox and the best shift assistant in the field. It drives simply but quickly. You sit rather low in the vehicle.

Best shift assistant in the nakedbike league

Universal motorbike without any real weaknesses

Powerful engine, awesome sound, great handling

On the racetrack a slightly too inactive riding position

Very wide range of equipment and accessory options

Very powerful brakes

Semi-active suspension makes setup fiddling superfluous

Original equipment tyres not the finest premium goods

Inactive seating position on racetrack

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Suzuki GSX-S1000

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2017 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2017 is about 44% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 97 days compared to 109 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 27/09/2014.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH