Honda NC700S 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-03 2016

Honda NC700S 2013

Honda NC700S 2013

Yamaha MT-03 2016

Yamaha MT-03 2016

Loading...

Overview - Honda NC700S 2013 vs Yamaha MT-03 2016

Honda NC700S 2013

Honda NC700S 2013

Yamaha MT-03 2016

Yamaha MT-03 2016

Technical Specifications Honda NC700S 2013 compared to Yamaha MT-03 2016

Honda NC700S 2013
Yamaha MT-03 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73 mmBore68 mm
StrokeStroke80 mmStroke44.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power42 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,750 rpm
TorqueTorque62 NmTorque29.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.7 Compression Ratio11.2
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigital, TransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeDual-clutchTransmission TypeGearshift
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement670 ccmDisplacement321 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, TubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,195 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth745 mm
HeightHeight1,130 mmHeight1,035 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,525 mmWheelbase1,380 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height780 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)211 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)168 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14.1 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda NC700S 2013

Honda NC700S 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha MT-03 2016

Yamaha MT-03 2016

The MT-03 remains Yamaha's most accessible and pragmatic Hyper Naked in the segment. It scores with its low seat height, the easily controllable power of the two-cylinder and at the same time offers enough comfort for commuters. What it may lack in sportiness, it makes up for in comfort, making it perfect for people looking for a well-functioning motorbike with a brutal look. However, you shouldn't be too big, and you shouldn't aspire to keep up with the other models in the MT range at the angle - because that's not what it was designed for. The 2020 model year is thus a coherent update that is sure to make its buyers happy.

Well controllable power

Low seat height

Easy to ride

Low consumption

Easy to read LC display

Aggressive look

Sharp knee angle for tall people

Soft chassis compared to other Yamaha MT models

Not the most emotional motorbike

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda NC700S vs Yamaha MT-03

Price Honda NC700S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-03

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH