Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016

The Kawasaki Z900 70kW model year 2020 and the BMW S 1000 R model year 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line 4-cylinder engines. However, there are significant differences in their technical specifications and overall performance.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 70kW produces 95 HP, while the BMW S 1000 R boasts a more powerful 160 HP engine. This gives the BMW a considerable advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, still provides enough power for most riders, even with throttle.

When it comes to torque, the Kawasaki Z900 70kW offers 91.2 Nm, while the BMW S 1000 R provides a higher torque of 112 Nm. This higher torque allows for better low-end and mid-range performance, making the BMW more responsive and easier to control.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension and swing arms with monoshock absorbers for the rear suspension. This setup provides good stability and handling for both models. However, the BMW S 1000 R has the advantage of a dynamic suspension system, which further enhances its performance and ride quality.

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

In terms of chassis, the Kawasaki Z900 70kW features a steel frame with a double cradle design, while the BMW S 1000 R has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. The aluminum frame of the BMW is lighter and more rigid, contributing to better overall handling and maneuverability.

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. However, the BMW S 1000 R utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, providing better stopping power and more precise control. The braking system of the BMW is considered to be more powerful and effective.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z900 70kW has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 1439 mm. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly higher at 814 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. The kerb weight of the Kawasaki is slightly heavier at 210 kg, while the BMW weighs 207 kg.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of rider assistance systems, both bikes offer advanced features such as ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. However, the BMW S 1000 R also includes dynamic suspension, which further enhances its performance and adaptability to different riding conditions.

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 offers enough power for most riders, great handling, good equipment, an aggressive look, and good value for money. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 boasts a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comfortable seating position.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 has a somewhat tiring menu navigation system and lacks the option for a quickshifter. The BMW S 1000 R 2016, on the other hand, has expensive optional extras that may be irresistible but can significantly increase the overall cost of the bike. Additionally, the BMW has a hard chassis, which may affect the overall comfort of the ride.

In conclusion, while the Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 offers good performance, handling, and value for money, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 provides a more powerful engine, better braking system, and additional features such as dynamic suspension. However, the BMW comes at a higher price point and may have some comfort-related drawbacks. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences, budget, and intended use of the bike.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020
BMW S 1000 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque91.2 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)210 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020

Whether you ride it with 70 kW, or in a further throttled 35 kW version: The Kawasaki Z900 is on a par with its open version - just with less power. That's why you can also be happy about the great handling and the updated electronics package for 2020. There's also good news about the engine. Even with 95 hp, the Kawa pulls tight on the chain and will give pleasure for many seasons! A bike you can grow with!

Enough power - even with throttle

great handling

good equipment

aggressive look

value for money.

Menu navigation somewhat tiring

missing quickshifter option

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 70kW vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 31% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are less Kawasaki Z900 70kW 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 197 days for the Kawasaki Z900 70kW. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 10 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 70kW and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 70kW was published on 23/11/2018 and now has more than 104,300 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price Kawasaki Z900 70kW

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH