Yamaha R3 2021 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2016

Yamaha R3 2021

Yamaha R3 2021

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha R3 2021 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2016

Yamaha R3 2021
KTM 690 Duke 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore68 mmBore102 mm
StrokeStroke44.1 mmStroke84.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power42 HPEngine power73 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque29.6 NmTorque70 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,000 rpmRpm at Torque5,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.2 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesRocker arm, OHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement321 ccmDisplacement690 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandKayabaBrandWP
DiameterDiameter37 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
TravelTravel125 mmTravel135 mm

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular
RakeRake25 degreeRake63.5 degree

Brakes Front

DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter240 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRide by Wire

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,380 mmWheelbase1,466 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height780 mmSeat Height835 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)169 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)149.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha R3 2021

Yamaha R3 2021

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

It is unbelievable how cultivated KTM has developed the single-cylinder without sacrificing performance. It can be considered a stroke of genius that, within the framework of the EURO4 standard, the engine's running culture was raised while at the same time increasing power. The flat torque curve is responsible for the smooth, powerful propulsion. From 4000 revs, the Duke pushes hard and revs up to 8500 revs. Even at low revs, the engine does not stutter or swallow, which is an advantage in the city. The Duke's greatest strength, apart from its rideability, is its manoeuvrability, which is why it can confidently be called a toy. It's only when you're on the racetrack and attacking hard that you wish you had the "R" under your bum.

suitable for everyday use

smooth running

low vibration

highly developed single-cylinder engine

versatile

Track Pack at extra cost

not sporty enough for the racetrack

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha R3 vs KTM 690 Duke

Price Yamaha R3

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH