Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022 vs. Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020
Loading...
Overview - Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020
Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022 compared to Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020
Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 78 mm | Bore | 78 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 86 mm | Stroke | 67.8 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 24 HP | Engine power | 47 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,100 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 32 Nm | Torque | 52 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 4,250 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 4,000 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 9.5 | Compression Ratio | 9.5 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric, Kick |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 5 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves | Valves | OHV | Valves | OHV |
Cooling | Cooling | Air | Cooling | Oil-air |
Displacement | Displacement | 411 ccm | Displacement | 648 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Travel | Travel | 200 mm | Travel | 110 mm |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Dual Shock |
Material | Material | Steel | Material | Steel |
Chassis
Frame type | Frame type | Double cradle | Frame type | Load-bearing engine |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Single disk | Type | Single disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 300 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 240 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 90 mm | Front tyre width | 100 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 120 mm | Rear tyre width | 130 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 90 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch |
Length | Length | 2,190 mm | Length | 2,122 mm |
Width | Width | 840 mm | Width | 744 mm |
Height | Height | 1,370 mm | Height | 1,024 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | Wheelbase | 1,400 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 800 mm | Seat Height | 790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 410
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
Model year
Current average market prices