Yamaha XJ6 2010 vs. Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

Yamaha XJ6 2010

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Loading...
Technical Specifications Yamaha XJ6 2010 compared to Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Yamaha XJ6 2010
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 65.5 mm | Bore | 83 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 44.5 mm | Stroke | 60 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 77 HP | Engine power | 68.2 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 59.7 Nm | Torque | 65.7 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 8,500 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 7,000 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.2 | Compression Ratio | 10.8 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Ignition | Ignition | Transistor | Ignition | Digital |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 600 ccm | Displacement | 649 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|
Chassis
Frame type | Frame type | Double cradle | Frame type | Tubular |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 160 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,120 mm | Length | 2,055 mm |
Width | Width | 770 mm | Width | 740 mm |
Height | Height | 1,085 mm | Height | 1,135 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,440 mm | Wheelbase | 1,410 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 785 mm | Seat Height | 790 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 210 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 193 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.3 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Yamaha XJ6 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017

The Ninja 650 firmly stamps its predecessor (Er-6f). The engine has mastered the Euro 4 hurdle well and serves up a very usable 68 hp, the chassis is simply great for this class, and the weight reduction of 18(!) kilos compared to the ER-6f justifies reverent nods.
Transparent chassis for sport
playful and good-natured handling, excellent brakes, sharp looks a la ZX-10R
resilient engine.
Little sound from the series pot
engine shows slight vibrations
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XJ6 vs Kawasaki Ninja 650
Price Yamaha XJ6
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Kawasaki Ninja 650
Model year
Current average market prices