Kawasaki Z650 2020 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z650 2020 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

In terms of engine and drive train, both the Kawasaki Z650 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 have inline engines with liquid cooling. However, the Z650 has a 649cc engine with 68.2 HP and 65.7 Nm of torque, while the Street Triple has a larger 675cc engine with 106 HP and 68 Nm of torque. The Z650 has a 2-cylinder engine, while the Street Triple has 3 cylinders.

In terms of suspension, the Z650 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the Street Triple has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. The Street Triple also offers compression and rebound adjustment for the rear suspension, while the Z650 only has preload adjustment.

The chassis of the Z650 is tubular, while the Street Triple has a twin tube frame. Both bikes have front brakes with double pistons, but the Street Triple's front brakes use radial technology, which provides better braking performance.

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the Street Triple has a wider rear tire width of 180mm compared to the Z650's 160mm. Both bikes have a wheelbase of 1410mm, but the Street Triple has a slightly higher seat height of 800mm compared to the Z650's 790mm. The Street Triple also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters compared to the Z650's 15 liters.

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Z650 has a powerful two-cylinder engine that delivers a thrilling riding experience. It also has an aggressive intake noise that adds to the excitement. The bike's compact dimensions and low seat height make it suitable for riders of all sizes. The Z650 also has a stable chassis that provides confidence-inspiring handling. Additionally, it features a TFT display with connectivity options, allowing riders to easily access information and stay connected. Lastly, the Z650 has a mature and grown-up look, appealing to riders who prefer a more sophisticated aesthetic.

On the other hand, the Street Triple 675 R 2013 has a taut and playful chassis that offers agile handling. The bike's low weight further enhances its maneuverability. It also boasts powerful brakes that provide excellent stopping power. Additionally, the Street Triple offers a comfortable riding position, making it suitable for longer rides.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

However, the Z650 does have some weaknesses. Some riders have reported issues with the front brake pressure point, which may require adjustment. Additionally, taller riders may find the Z650 uncomfortable due to its compact dimensions. Lastly, while the Z650 features a Rideology App for connectivity, it may not be as sophisticated as some other systems on the market.

Similarly, the Street Triple also has a weakness in its brake application, which can feel a little brute towards the end of the braking process.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z650 offers a powerful engine and a stable chassis, while the Street Triple provides a taut and playful chassis with powerful brakes. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z650 2020 compared to Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Kawasaki Z650 2020
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke52.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power68.2 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,850 rpm
TorqueTorque65.7 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement675 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight185 kgKerb Weight183 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

It's simply marvellous what Kawasaki has put together in a complete package with the new Z650. The technical components may not knock your socks off individually, but in combination they make for a pleasantly neutral motorbike that everyone will enjoy. No bitchy idiosyncrasies - simply a naked bike that works really well on winding country roads. Of course, the TFT display, which we don't find in the competition at the moment, is a plus, as is the grown-up look, which is strongly oriented towards the larger Z models. Only the pressure point of the front brake could have been more clearly defined - but you can't have everything in this price range.

powerful two-cylinder engine

aggressive intake noise

compact dimensions

low seat height

stable chassis

TFT display with connectivity

grown-up look

Front brake pressure point

probably uncomfortable for tall riders

Rideology Appn och not 100% sophisticated.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013

If you're looking for a lively naked bike in the mid-range segment that's especially fun for sporty rides on country roads, the Street Triple 675 R is the perfect choice. Whether the manageable surcharge for the R pays off should be decided according to whether you really want to adjust the chassis or leave it in the well-chosen basic setup anyway.

Taut, playful chassis

agile

low weight

powerful brake

comfort offered.

Brake application a little brute towards the end.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z650 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z650 2020 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 21. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 52 days compared to 80 days for the Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Kawasaki Z650 was published on 08/11/2016 and now has more than 25,000 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 20/07/2008.

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH