Yamaha R1 2016 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha R1 2016 vs Yamaha XSR900 2022

The Yamaha R1 model year 2016 and the Yamaha XSR900 model year 2022 are two different motorcycles that cater to different riding preferences and styles.

Starting with the Yamaha R1 2016, it is a supersport bike that is designed for high-performance riding. It is equipped with a 998cc engine that produces 200 horsepower and 112.4 Nm of torque. The engine has a bore of 79mm and a stroke of 50.9mm, resulting in a high-revving and precisely controllable power delivery. The compression ratio is 13, which contributes to the bike's performance. The R1 features a 4-cylinder DOHC engine with 4 valves per cylinder. The cooling system is liquid-based, ensuring optimal engine temperature.

In terms of suspension, the R1 is equipped with an Upside-Down telescopic fork at the front, providing excellent handling and stability. The frame is made of aluminum, specifically a Deltabox frame, which is known for its rigidity and lightweight characteristics. The front brakes are double disk, ensuring strong and reliable stopping power. The R1 also features advanced rider assistance systems such as launch control and traction control, enhancing the bike's performance and safety.

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha R1 2016

Moving on to the Yamaha XSR900 2022, it is a naked bike that offers a balance between sportiness and everyday usability. It is powered by an 889cc engine that produces 119 horsepower and 93 Nm of torque. The engine has a bore of 78mm and a stroke of 62.1mm, resulting in a powerful and responsive performance. The compression ratio is 11.5, which contributes to the bike's overall performance. Similar to the R1, the XSR900 features a 3-cylinder DOHC engine with 4 valves per cylinder. The cooling system is also liquid-based, ensuring optimal engine temperature.

In terms of suspension, the XSR900 is equipped with an Upside-Down telescopic fork at the front, providing a comfortable and controlled ride. The frame is made of aluminum, specifically a Twin Tube frame, which offers a good balance between rigidity and flexibility. The front brakes are double disk, providing reliable stopping power. The XSR900 also features a comprehensive electronics package, including ABS, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, shift assistant with blipper, cruise control, and traction control. This enhances the bike's safety and performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the R1 has a wheelbase of 1405mm and a seat height of 855mm. It has a kerb weight of 199kg (with ABS) and a fuel tank capacity of 17 liters. On the other hand, the XSR900 has a longer wheelbase of 1495mm and a lower seat height of 810mm. It has a slightly lighter kerb weight of 193kg (with ABS) and a smaller fuel tank capacity of 15 liters.

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

In terms of strengths, the R1 2016 is known for its lively handling, high-revving and precisely controllable engine, and excellent electronics package. On the other hand, the XSR900 2022 has a powerful engine, quickshifter as standard, good brakes, a comprehensive electronics package, sporty but everyday ergonomics, value for money, and many accessories available ex works.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The R1 2016's weakness is that it only has a shift assistant for upshifting, while the XSR900 2022 has a hard seat and a low steering angle.

In conclusion, the Yamaha R1 2016 and the Yamaha XSR900 2022 are two different motorcycles that cater to different riding preferences. The R1 is a high-performance supersport bike, while the XSR900 offers a balance between sportiness and everyday usability. Both bikes have their strengths and weaknesses, and riders should consider their own preferences and riding style when choosing between the two.

Technical Specifications Yamaha R1 2016 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha R1 2016
Yamaha XSR900 2022

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power200 HPEngine power119 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112.4 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement889 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsLaunch-Control, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,055 mmLength2,155 mm
WidthWidth690 mmWidth860 mm
HeightHeight1,150 mmHeight1,155 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height855 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)193 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha R1 2016

Yamaha's high-tech rocket is still a technological leader in 2016. Radical, polarising and fascinating, it sets powerful lap times. It is closer to the race bikes than the other 1000s. In the meantime, no one grumbles about the front. Without the "M", it is the best choice for those who don't need Öhlins anyway, or the best choice for those who are planning a racetrack conversion anyway and like to install "normal" Öhlins hardware without electric stuff.

Lively handling

high-revving and precisely controllable engine

excellent electronics package

Shift assistant only for upshifting

Yamaha XSR900 2022

Yamaha XSR900 2022

The XSR900 in no way wants to hide the fact that it uses the MT-09 as its basis. With a full electronics package, powerful three-cylinder and sporty chassis components, you can be incredibly sporty on this retro bike. Hopefully you'll just find a more comfortable seat in the accessories soon - because it's going to take a lot of stops on the standard seat.

powerful engine

quickshifter as standard

good brakes

electronics package

sporty but everyday ergonomics

value for money

many accessories available ex works

hard seat

low steering angle

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha R1 vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha R1 2016 and a Yamaha XSR900 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha R1 2016 is about 52% higher. A Yamaha R1 2016 experiences a loss of 680 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 290 GBP for a Yamaha XSR900 2022. Compared to Yamaha XSR900 2022 there are less Yamaha R1 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 59. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha R1 with 73 days compared to 97 days for a Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 80 reviews for the Yamaha R1 and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha R1 was published on 28/04/2003 and now has more than 3,900 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 25/11/2015.

Price Yamaha R1

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH