Honda CBF 600 S 2010 vs. Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CBF 600 S 2010

Honda CBF 600 S 2010

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

Loading...

Overview - Honda CBF 600 S 2010 vs Honda CB500F 2013

The Honda CBF 600 S 2010 and the Honda CB500F 2013 are both naked bikes from Honda, but they have some notable differences in their specifications and strengths.

Starting with the technical specifications, the Honda CBF 600 S 2010 is equipped with an in-line engine that produces 78 HP of power and 59 Nm of torque. It has a liquid cooling system and a displacement of 599.3 ccm. The bike features an aluminum frame and double disk brakes with double piston calipers. The front and rear tires have a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches respectively. The wheelbase measures 1490 mm and the seat height is 785 mm. With ABS, the bike weighs 222 kg and has a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.

Honda CBF 600 S 2010

Honda CBF 600 S 2010

On the other hand, the Honda CB500F 2013 also has an in-line engine, but it produces 48 HP of power and 43 Nm of torque. It also has a liquid cooling system, but its displacement is smaller at 471 ccm. The bike features a steel frame and a single disk brake with a double piston caliper. The front and rear tires have the same dimensions as the CBF 600 S. The wheelbase is shorter at 1410 mm and the seat height is slightly higher at 790 mm. With ABS, the bike weighs 192 kg and has a fuel tank capacity of 15.7 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Honda CBF 600 S 2010 offers ABS, a 3-position adjustable seat, and a 2-position adjustable handlebar, providing optimal riding comfort and customization options. It also has a reputation for being beginner-friendly, making it a suitable choice for riders who are new to motorcycles.

On the other hand, the Honda CB500F 2013 has a relatively low overall weight, which contributes to its agile and nimble handling. The bike also offers a successful seating position, providing good comfort for the rider. Additionally, it has a strong engine that delivers satisfactory performance.

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Honda CBF 600 S 2010 is often associated with a normal and unemotional image, which may not appeal to riders looking for a more stylish or exciting bike. On the other hand, the Honda CB500F 2013 has been criticized for its partially shoddy workmanship and the lack of a gear indicator, which can be inconvenient for some riders.

In conclusion, the Honda CBF 600 S 2010 and the Honda CB500F 2013 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The CBF 600 S offers ABS and adjustable features, making it beginner-friendly and customizable. The CB500F, on the other hand, has a lower weight, agile handling, and a strong engine. However, the CBF 600 S may lack the desired image for some riders, while the CB500F has some quality and convenience issues. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Honda CBF 600 S 2010 compared to Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CBF 600 S 2010
Honda CB500F 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
Honda CBF 600 S 2010
Honda CBF 600 S 2010
Honda CB500F 2013
Honda CB500F 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke42.5 mmStroke66.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power78 HPEngine power48 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power5,500 rpm
TorqueTorque59 NmTorque43 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.6 Compression Ratio10.7
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599.3 ccmDisplacement471 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,160 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth765 mmWidth780 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,060 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,490 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height790 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)222 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)192 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity15.7 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CBF 600 S 2010

Honda CBF 600 S 2010

The CBF fits the bill. Honda hit the bull's eye with the concept of an easy-to-ride, reliable and at the same time fun motorbike. The two CBF model variants - naked and semi-dressed - remained at the top of the sales statistics in Austria and Germany for years.

ABS

3-position (height) adjustable seat

2-position adjustable handlebar

optimal riding feel

beginner-friendly.

Image of a normal and unemotional.

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

However, such minor details cannot tarnish the good image of the Honda CB500F. After the first few metres, there was no question that it would be an excellent choice as an entry-level motorbike. But the fact that it can also meet higher demands is a little surprising, especially the engine pleases with its agile response and pronounced revving pleasure.

Relatively low overall weight

agile

nimble handling

acceptable chassis

good comfort

strong engine

successful seating position.

Partially shoddy workmanship

lack of gear indicator.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CBF 600 S vs Honda CB500F

There are a few key differences between a Honda CBF 600 S 2010 and a Honda CB500F 2013. It takes less time to sell a Honda CB500F with 54 days compared to 72 days for the Honda CBF 600 S. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Honda CBF 600 S and 22 reviews for the Honda CB500F since model year 2013. The first review for the Honda CBF 600 S was published on 26/07/2005 and now has more than 22,200 views. This compares to more than 18,500 views for the first review on Honda CB500F published on 10/11/2012.

Price Honda CBF 600 S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CB500F

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthcalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AG