KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2017

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - KTM 690 Duke 2013 vs BMW S 1000 R 2017

The KTM 690 Duke 2013 is a lightweight naked bike with a 68 HP engine and 70 Nm of torque. It has a single cylinder engine with liquid cooling and a displacement of 690 ccm. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork and the frame is made of chromium-molybdenum. The front brakes have four pistons and use radial technology. The bike also features advanced rider assistance systems such as ride by wire. The front tire width is 120 mm with a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire width is 160 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1466 mm and the seat height is 835 mm. The fuel tank capacity is 14 liters.

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 is a more powerful naked bike with a 165 HP engine and 114 Nm of torque. It has a four-cylinder engine with liquid cooling and a displacement of 999 ccm. The front suspension is also an upside-down telescopic fork, but the frame is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design. The front brakes have four pistons and use radial technology. The bike features advanced rider assistance systems such as dynamic suspension. The front tire width is 120 mm with a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire width is 190 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is slightly shorter at 1439 mm and the seat height is 814 mm. The fuel tank capacity is larger at 17.5 liters.

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 is praised for its light weight, sufficient power, and low consumption. It provides a nimble and agile riding experience. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 is known for having the best shift assistant in the naked bike league, a powerful engine with an awesome sound, and great handling. It is considered a universal motorcycle without any real weaknesses. It also offers a wide range of equipment and accessory options, powerful brakes, and a semi-active suspension that eliminates the need for setup adjustments.

However, the KTM 690 Duke 2013 does have some weaknesses. It does not have chassis adjustment options, limiting customization and fine-tuning for individual preferences. Additionally, it may lack in terms of comfort, especially for longer rides.

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

Similarly, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 has a few weaknesses. The original equipment tires are not considered the finest premium goods, which may impact the bike's performance and handling. On the racetrack, the seating position is described as slightly inactive, which may affect the rider's control and maneuverability.

In conclusion, while the KTM 690 Duke 2013 offers a lightweight and efficient option with sufficient power, the BMW S 1000 R 2017 provides a more powerful and versatile naked bike with a range of advanced features and options. However, both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses that should be considered based on individual preferences and riding needs.

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Duke 2013 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2017

KTM 690 Duke 2013
BMW S 1000 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore102 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke84.5 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power68 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque70 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement690 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRide by WireAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,466 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height814 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Duke 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2013

For pure fun, the 690 Duke without the R is already sufficient. The potent single-cylinder engine is almost identical, as is the weight and handling, and the appearance is too similar to be a real selling point for the 690 Duke R.

Light weight

sufficient power

low consumption

No chassis adjustment possible

low comfort

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW S 1000 R 2017

BMW's universal talent also got better in 2017. The BMW offers the widest range of use and an exceptionally cultivated engine, a perfect gearbox and the best shift assistant in the field. It drives simply but quickly. You sit rather low in the vehicle.

Best shift assistant in the nakedbike league

Universal motorbike without any real weaknesses

Powerful engine, awesome sound, great handling

On the racetrack a slightly too inactive riding position

Very wide range of equipment and accessory options

Very powerful brakes

Semi-active suspension makes setup fiddling superfluous

Original equipment tyres not the finest premium goods

Inactive seating position on racetrack

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 Duke vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2013 and a BMW S 1000 R 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2017 is about 141% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2017 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 9 compared to 22. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 60 days compared to 97 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 28/09/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH