Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-03 2019

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Yamaha MT-03 2019

Yamaha MT-03 2019

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 vs Yamaha MT-03 2019

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Yamaha MT-03 2019

Yamaha MT-03 2019

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-03 2019

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016
Yamaha MT-03 2019

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore68 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke44.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power42 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,750 rpm
TorqueTorque64 NmTorque29.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio11.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement321 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,110 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth745 mm
HeightHeight1,110 mmHeight1,035 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,380 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height780 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)208 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)168 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Yamaha MT-03 2019

Yamaha MT-03 2019

The MT-03 remains Yamaha's most accessible and pragmatic Hyper Naked in the segment. It scores with its low seat height, the easily controllable power of the two-cylinder and at the same time offers enough comfort for commuters. What it may lack in sportiness, it makes up for in comfort, making it perfect for people looking for a well-functioning motorbike with a brutal look. However, you shouldn't be too big, and you shouldn't aspire to keep up with the other models in the MT range at the angle - because that's not what it was designed for. The 2020 model year is thus a coherent update that is sure to make its buyers happy.

Well controllable power

Low seat height

Easy to ride

Low consumption

Easy to read LC display

Aggressive look

Sharp knee angle for tall people

Soft chassis compared to other Yamaha MT models

Not the most emotional motorbike

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Yamaha MT-03

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-03

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH