Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. Both bikes have an in-line engine type, upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, and an aluminum twin tube frame. They also have four-piston radial front brakes and 17-inch front and rear tires.

However, there are some notable differences between the two bikes. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a more powerful engine compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. It has 160 HP of engine power and 112 Nm of torque, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has 132 HP of engine power and 110 Nm of torque. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 also has four cylinders and a displacement of 999 ccm, whereas the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has three cylinders and a displacement of 1050 ccm.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the 1437 mm of the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. The seat height of the BMW S 1000 R 2014 is slightly lower at 814 mm, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has a seat height of 828 mm. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

When it comes to strengths, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 is known for its sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, very good electronic helpers, and terrific price/performance ratio. It is also said to be fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

However, there are some weaknesses associated with each bike. The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 has rough gearing that can sometimes disturb the connection between the rider and the machine. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and the DDC (Dynamic Damping Control) suspension system, while working well, is still rather on the "hard" side overall. The seat of the BMW S 1000 R 2014 is relatively high, and the design is subjective and a matter of personal taste. Additionally, the bike may tempt riders to overdrive due to its powerful performance.

In conclusion, while both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 have their strengths and weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 stands out with its higher engine power, better electronic helpers, and overall sportier performance. However, personal preferences and riding style should also be taken into consideration when choosing between the two bikes.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power132 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque110 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,086 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth728 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,437 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height814 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 52% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 720 GBP in one year and 840 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 600 GBP and 620 GBP for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 77 days for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 02/10/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH