SWM RS 300 R 2018 vs. Husqvarna TE 310 2011

SWM RS 300 R 2018

SWM RS 300 R 2018

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Loading...

Technical Specifications SWM RS 300 R 2018 compared to Husqvarna TE 310 2011

SWM RS 300 R 2018
Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke55 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement298 ccmDisplacement297 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandKayabaBrandMarzocchi

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandMarzocchi

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107 kgDry Weight111 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

SWM RS 300 R 2018

SWM RS 300 R 2018

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

The Italian with new Bavarian roots is brand new in the business. The missing link between the E1 and E2 class. And that is exactly the performance that will make masses of hobby riders happy. KTM has already shown the way with the 400, and now others are following suit.

Optimal chassis and manoeuvrability

plenty of engine power

warranty.

clumsy ignition lock/switch

high weight

clutch with weaknesses

Alternative Comparisons