BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. Kawasaki Z 750 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Kawasaki Z 750 2013
Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs Kawasaki Z 750 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Kawasaki Z 750 2013
Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2014 compared to Kawasaki Z 750 2013
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 80 mm | Bore | 68.4 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 49.7 mm | Stroke | 50.9 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 160 HP | Engine power | 106 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 11,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 112 Nm | Torque | 78 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 9,250 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 8,300 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12 | Compression Ratio | 11.3 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Displacement | Displacement | 999 ccm | Displacement | 748 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Steel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Double piston |
Technology | Technology | radial | Technology | Petal |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 190 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,057 mm | Length | 2,085 mm |
Width | Width | 845 mm | Width | 805 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,439 mm | Wheelbase | 1,440 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 814 mm | Seat Height | 815 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 207 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 230 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.
Sporty chassis
extreme power and performance
very good electronic helpers
terrific price/performance ratio
fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.
Slightly rough engine running
DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall
seat relatively high
tempts to overdrive
design a matter of taste.
Kawasaki Z 750 2013

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.
improved torque curve
upside-down fork
aggressive engine
low price
high weight
4 hp less than the predecessor
not exactly effortless driving