Beta RE 125 4T 2015 vs. Honda CBF 125 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2015

Beta RE 125 4T 2015

Honda CBF 125 2009

Honda CBF 125 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Beta RE 125 4T 2015 compared to Honda CBF 125 2009

Beta RE 125 4T 2015
Honda CBF 125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore52.4 mm
StrokeStroke54 mmStroke57.8 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10 Compression Ratio9.2
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDrum

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength1,955 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth760 mm
HeightHeight1,200 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,370 mmWheelbase1,270 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height890 mmSeat Height792 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity5.7 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta RE 125 4T 2015

Beta RE 125 4T 2015

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Honda CBF 125 2009

Honda CBF 125 2009

Thanks to its extremely low fuel consumption, it's a tip for those who want to save money. In the city, the CBF can play to its strengths, but powerful braking is not one of them.

Manoeuvrability

sleek lines

low fuel consumption.

Brake not optimal

tiny storage compartment

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RE 125 4T vs Honda CBF 125

Price Beta RE 125 4T

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Honda CBF 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons