BMW F 850 GS 2018 vs. BMW S 1000 XR 2020

BMW F 850 GS 2018

BMW F 850 GS 2018

BMW S 1000 XR 2020

BMW S 1000 XR 2020

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 850 GS 2018 vs BMW S 1000 XR 2020

The BMW F 850 GS 2018 and the BMW S 1000 XR 2020 are both impressive motorcycles with their own unique features and strengths.

Starting with the BMW F 850 GS 2018, it is an enduro motorcycle with a powerful engine. The in-line, 2-cylinder engine delivers 95 HP and 92 Nm of torque, providing superior performance. The bike also features a chain transmission and a 4-stroke engine with a displacement of 853 ccm.

In terms of suspension, the F 850 GS has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension with a diameter of 43 mm and a travel of 204 mm. The rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock and a travel of 219 mm. The suspension can be adjusted for preload and rebound, allowing for a personalized riding experience. The chassis is made of steel and has a tubular, load-bearing engine frame. The rake is 62 degrees and the trail is 126 mm.

BMW F 850 GS 2018

BMW F 850 GS 2018

The braking system of the F 850 GS consists of double disk brakes with a diameter of 305 mm at the front. The bike also features ABS as an advanced rider assistance system. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 90 mm and a diameter of 21 inches, and a rear tire width of 150 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1593 mm and the seat height is 860 mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 229 kg and the fuel tank capacity is 15 liters.

Moving on to the BMW S 1000 XR 2020, it is a sport touring motorcycle with a more powerful engine than the F 850 GS. The in-line, 4-cylinder engine delivers an impressive 165 HP and 114 Nm of torque. The bike also features a chain transmission and a 4-stroke engine with a displacement of 999 ccm.

In terms of suspension, the S 1000 XR has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension with a diameter of 45 mm and a travel of 150 mm. The rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock and a travel of 150 mm. The suspension can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound, allowing for a more personalized and comfortable setup. The chassis is made of aluminum and has a twin tube, load-bearing engine frame. The rake is 65.1 degrees and the trail is 116 mm.

The braking system of the S 1000 XR consists of double disk brakes with a diameter of 320 mm at the front. The bike also features advanced rider assistance systems such as electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, and traction control. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, and a rear tire width of 190 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1552 mm and the seat height is 840 mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 226 kg and the fuel tank capacity is 20 liters.

BMW S 1000 XR 2020

BMW S 1000 XR 2020

In terms of strengths, the F 850 GS has a superior engine, adequate braking system, very good seating position, easy handling, extensive range of accessories, riding modes, traction control, and off-road capability. On the other hand, the S 1000 XR has strengths such as great connection and integration from mobile phone to vehicle, a revving four-cylinder engine with a wide usable rev band, pleasant engine tuning, practical riding modes that change response behavior, a well-balanced vehicle even with a pillion passenger, good brakes, good wind and weather protection, adjustable windshield with one hand, and a good quickshifter.

As for weaknesses, the F 850 GS has a disc that is too low and the sound could be better. On the other hand, the S 1000 XR has a knee angle on long tours that may be a bit narrow for tall people and the suspension damping is not sensitive enough, making it difficult to achieve a really comfortable setup.

Overall, both motorcycles have their own strengths and weaknesses, and it ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and intended use. The F 850 GS is more suited for off-road adventures, while the S 1000 XR is better for sport touring.

Technical Specifications BMW F 850 GS 2018 compared to BMW S 1000 XR 2020

BMW F 850 GS 2018
BMW S 1000 XR 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore84 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke77 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque92 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.7 Compression Ratio12.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement853 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter45 mm
TravelTravel204 mmTravel150 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel219 mmTravel150 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine
RakeRake62 degreeRake65.1 degree
TrailTrail126 mmTrail116 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter305 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter265 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,305 mmLength2,333 mm
WidthWidth922 mmWidth850 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,593 mmWheelbase1,552 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height860 mmSeat Height840 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)229 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)226 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 850 GS 2018

BMW F 850 GS 2018

The BMW F 850 GS also scores points in 2022 with its pleasant ergonomics and accessible character. Operation is easy and you quickly feel comfortable on the motorbike. The longer the tour, the more you miss the finesse in the details. The damping of the fork is too lax and not adjustable. The engine gets a bit boring in the long run, and the gearstick and quickshifter are always stiff. In direct comparison with other touring enduros, it is always somewhat overshadowed by more exciting models.

Good wind and weather protection

well thought-out operating concept

practical equipment

very accessible operation and driveability in everyday use

good seat comfort

great connectivity solution

Vibrations in the upper rev range

boring engine

stiff quickshifter gearstick

front damping too lax

fork not adjustable

ponderous feel

front brake could do with more bite.

BMW S 1000 XR 2020

BMW S 1000 XR 2020

The BMW S 1000 XR offers a pleasant touring motorbike on the basis of a supersports bike. It sounds like a compromise - but it rides like a precisely targeted development. The bike is practical and mature. Wind and weather protection are very good, the integration of the mobile phone is well tested and intuitive and the engine is simply always a joy to ride. Although the suspension adapts well to the load, it is never sensitive or really comfortable. The seating comfort is good, but the knee angle becomes a little sharp when touring for long distances. Nevertheless, it's a great bike for sporty riding but also for long distances.

Riding modes change reponsiveness in practice

great revvy four-cylinder engine with a wide usable torque curve

well-balanced vehicle - even with a pillion - thanks to electronic suspension with automatic load condition detection

good brakes

Knee angle a bit tight for tall people when touring long distances

suspension does not dampen sensitively enough - no really comfortable setup possible

high fuel consumption

Price Comparison Average Market Price BMW F 850 GS vs BMW S 1000 XR

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 850 GS 2018 and a BMW S 1000 XR 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 XR 2020 is about 49% higher. A BMW F 850 GS 2018 experiences a loss of 2,480 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 520 GBP for a BMW S 1000 XR 2020. Compared to BMW S 1000 XR 2020 there are less BMW F 850 GS 2018 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 21. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 XR with 68 days compared to 112 days for the BMW F 850 GS. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 31 reviews for the BMW F 850 GS and 40 reviews for the BMW S 1000 XR since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW F 850 GS was published on 21/11/2017 and now has more than 69,800 views. This compares to more than 16,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 XR published on 21/10/2014.

Price BMW F 850 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 XR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons