Husqvarna CR 50 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna CR 50 2012 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna CR 50 2012
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore39 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke40 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeCentrifugal forceClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement49 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandMarzocchiBrandWP

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width60 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter12 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter10 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase995 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height680 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight43.3 kgDry Weight96 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.7 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Husqvarna CR 50 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH