Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Yamaha R1M 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha R1M 2020

Yamaha R1M 2020

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 2016 compared to Yamaha R1M 2020

Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha R1M 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke50.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power200 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque112.4 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque11,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio13
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsLaunch-Control, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width200 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,055 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth690 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height855 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)200 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Yamaha R1M 2020

Yamaha R1M 2020

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 vs Yamaha R1M

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha R1M

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH