Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs. Yamaha MT-07 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs Yamaha MT-07 2016

The Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline 2-cylinder engines with liquid cooling. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slight advantage with 75 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011's 72 HP. The torque is also slightly higher on the Yamaha MT-07 with 68 Nm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 66 Nm. Both bikes have a displacement of around 650ccm.

In terms of chassis, both bikes have a steel frame, which provides stability and durability. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1410mm compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 1400mm. This may result in slightly different handling characteristics.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. The Yamaha MT-07 2016 is praised for its powerful brakes, which provide excellent stopping power. The Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 also has ABS, which enhances safety by preventing the wheels from locking up during hard braking.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 is lighter than the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011. The Yamaha MT-07 has a kerb weight of 179 kg (182 kg with ABS), while the Kawasaki ER-6n weighs 204 kg (208 kg with ABS). The Yamaha MT-07 also has a slightly lower seat height of 805mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 790mm.

In terms of tire width, both bikes have a front tire width of 120mm. However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a wider rear tire with a width of 180mm, compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011's 160mm rear tire. This may provide better traction and stability for the Yamaha MT-07.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has a larger capacity of 15.5 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 14 liters. This may result in a longer range for the Kawasaki ER-6n.

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 has ABS, wider handlebars, a slimmer waist, increased intake noise, a comfortable seat, and an uncomplicated chassis. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a very agile engine, very easy handling, low weight, an aggressively angular look, powerful brakes, a comfortable seating position, a throaty sound, and an extensive and easy-to-read display.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 does not have any notable weaknesses. However, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slightly soft chassis, footrests that may drag, partly cheap plastic parts, and a boring telescopic fork.

Overall, both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 and the Yamaha MT-07 2016 are solid naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on individual preferences and priorities, such as power, weight, handling, and design.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Yamaha MT-07 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore83 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke68.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpm
TorqueTorque66 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,085 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth745 mm
HeightHeight1,100 mmHeight1,090 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height805 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight204 kgKerb Weight179 kg
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)208 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)182 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

You won't find such a coherent package with such fine details anywhere else at this price. The ER-6n has become a little sharper again, both visually and dynamically, and is more fun than ever.

ABS

wider handlebars

slimmer waist

increased intake noise

comfortable seat

uncomplicated chassis.

None

Yamaha MT-07 2016

Yamaha MT-07 2016

The MT-07 is an incredible fun machine that is extremely sporty to ride. The brakes pack a punch, the handling is superb and the engine is currently by far the most agile powerplant in this class - and even above.

Very agile engine

very easy handling

low weight

aggressively angular look

powerful brakes

comfortable seating position

throaty sound

extensive and easy-to-read display

Chassis a little soft

Footrests soon drag

partly cheap plastic parts

boring telescopic fork

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Yamaha MT-07

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 and a Yamaha MT-07 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-07 2016 is about 57% higher. A Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 experiences a loss of 240 GBP in one year and 510 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 GBP and 720 GBP for a Yamaha MT-07 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-07 2016 there are less Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 5 compared to 24. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 49 days compared to 51 days for a Yamaha MT-07. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 29/06/2005 and now has more than 11,200 views. This compares to more than 12,600 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-07 published on 04/11/2013.

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-07

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH