Honda CB500F 2013 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Loading...

Overview - Honda CB500F 2013 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The Honda CB500F 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki ER-6n takes the lead with 72 HP compared to the Honda CB500F's 48 HP. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n has a more powerful and faster acceleration, making it suitable for riders who crave speed and performance. However, the Honda CB500F's engine power is still respectable and provides a satisfying riding experience.

Both bikes have a liquid-cooled, in-line engine with two cylinders, ensuring efficient cooling and smooth performance. The Honda CB500F has a displacement of 471ccm, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a larger displacement of 649ccm. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n has a bigger engine, which contributes to its higher power output.

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

In terms of chassis, both bikes feature a steel frame, providing stability and durability. The Honda CB500F offers agile and nimble handling, thanks to its relatively low overall weight. It also has an acceptable chassis and good comfort, making it suitable for both city commuting and longer rides. The Kawasaki ER-6n also offers solid handling, ensuring a confident and enjoyable riding experience.

When it comes to braking, the Kawasaki ER-6n has an advantage with its double disk front brakes compared to the Honda CB500F's single disk front brakes. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n has better stopping power and control, enhancing safety and confidence while riding.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also share the same wheelbase of 1410mm. However, there are slight differences in seat height and weight. The Honda CB500F has a lower seat height of 790mm, making it more accessible for riders with shorter inseams. It also has a lower kerb weight of 192kg (with ABS) compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 208kg (with ABS). This lower weight contributes to the Honda CB500F's agility and nimble handling.

Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity that allows for decent range. The Honda CB500F has a capacity of 15.7 liters, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a slightly larger capacity of 16 liters.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

In terms of weaknesses, the Honda CB500F has been criticized for its partially shoddy workmanship, indicating potential quality issues. It also lacks a gear indicator, which can be inconvenient for riders who prefer to have this information readily available.

On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n has been noted for its weak brake performance, which may require some adjustments or upgrades for riders seeking more responsive braking.

In conclusion, both the Honda CB500F 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 offer exciting riding experiences with their respective strengths and weaknesses. The Honda CB500F provides a lighter and more agile ride, with a strong engine and comfortable seating position. The Kawasaki ER-6n offers solid handling and a higher power output, but may require some improvements in its braking system. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Honda CB500F 2013 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Honda CB500F 2013
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke66.8 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power48 HPEngine power72 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power5,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque43 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.7 Compression Ratio10.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigital, TransistorIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement471 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,110 mm
WidthWidth780 mmWidth770 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height805 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)192 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)208 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.7 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

However, such minor details cannot tarnish the good image of the Honda CB500F. After the first few metres, there was no question that it would be an excellent choice as an entry-level motorbike. But the fact that it can also meet higher demands is a little surprising, especially the engine pleases with its agile response and pronounced revving pleasure.

Relatively low overall weight

agile

nimble handling

acceptable chassis

good comfort

strong engine

successful seating position.

Partially shoddy workmanship

lack of gear indicator.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CB500F vs Kawasaki ER-6n

There are a few key differences between a Honda CB500F 2013 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 54 days for the Honda CB500F. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the Honda CB500F and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Honda CB500F was published on 10/11/2012 and now has more than 18,500 views. This compares to more than 11,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 29/06/2005.

Price Honda CB500F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH