ChigeeMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHContinental Motorradreifen

SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs. Husqvarna TE 300 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Loading...

Overview - SWM RS 300 R 2016 vs Husqvarna TE 300 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Technical Specifications SWM RS 300 R 2016 compared to Husqvarna TE 300 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
SWM RS 300 R 2016
SWM RS 300 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric, Kick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionKokusan
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement298 ccmDisplacement293.2 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandKayabaBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandWP

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107 kgDry Weight104.6 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter thanks to the balancer shaft, the two-stroke has also been lightened, with the 300 now weighing in at 102 kg. The choice for Erzberg, Romaniacs and Co!

Much quieter due to balancer shaft

powerful engine

best balance of weight and performance

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price SWM RS 300 R vs Husqvarna TE 300

Price SWM RS 300 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Husqvarna TE 300 2017
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300i 2018

Husqvarna TE 300 2017 vs
Husqvarna TE 300i 2018

SWM RS 300 R 2018
VS.
SWM RS 500 R 2020

SWM RS 300 R 2018 vs
SWM RS 500 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 300 2017
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300i 2022

Husqvarna TE 300 2017 vs
Husqvarna TE 300i 2022

KTM 300 EXC 2017
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300 2017

KTM 300 EXC 2017 vs
Husqvarna TE 300 2017

Husqvarna TE 300 2015
VS.
Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs
Beta RR 300 2T 2015

KTM 300 EXC TPI 2019
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300 2018

KTM 300 EXC TPI 2019 vs
Husqvarna TE 300 2018

Husqvarna TE 300 2017
VS.
Beta RR 300 2T 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2017 vs
Beta RR 300 2T 2015

SWM RS 300 R 2018
VS.
SWM RS 500 R 2018

SWM RS 300 R 2018 vs
SWM RS 500 R 2018

Yamaha WR250F 2021
VS.
SWM RS 300 R 2018

Yamaha WR250F 2021 vs
SWM RS 300 R 2018

Husqvarna TE 300 2024
VS.
KTM 300 EXC Sixdays 2024

Husqvarna TE 300 2024 vs
KTM 300 EXC Sixdays 2024

SWM RS 300 R 2022
VS.
SWM RS 500 R 2020

SWM RS 300 R 2022 vs
SWM RS 500 R 2020

Beta Xtrainer 300 2017
VS.
Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Beta Xtrainer 300 2017 vs
Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2014
VS.
Husqvarna TE 310 2012

Husqvarna TE 300 2014 vs
Husqvarna TE 310 2012

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH