KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both powerful naked bikes that offer thrilling riding experiences. However, there are some key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R takes the lead with 173 HP, while the BMW S 1000 R offers 160 HP. This gives the KTM an advantage in terms of sheer acceleration and top speed. The KTM also has a higher torque rating of 144 Nm compared to the BMW's 112 Nm, which translates to better low-end power and more aggressive acceleration.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front suspension, providing excellent handling and stability. The KTM has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW boasts an aluminum frame. The choice of materials affects the overall weight and rigidity of the bike, with the KTM weighing in at 189 kg and the BMW at 207 kg. This gives the KTM a slight advantage in terms of maneuverability and agility.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

In terms of braking, both bikes feature four-piston front calipers and radial technology. The KTM also has monoblock calipers, which provide even more stopping power and precise control. Both bikes are equipped with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control, ensuring optimal safety and stability during aggressive riding.

In terms of dimensions, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters, offering similar levels of grip and stability. The KTM has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1482 mm compared to the BMW's 1439 mm, which may contribute to better stability at high speeds.

The seat height of the KTM is 835 mm, while the BMW sits slightly lower at 814 mm. This may be a factor for riders with shorter inseams, as the BMW may be more accessible and easier to handle at a standstill.

In terms of fuel capacity, the KTM has a larger tank with 18 liters compared to the BMW's 17.5 liters. This gives the KTM a slight advantage in terms of range and long-distance riding.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

When it comes to strengths, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 offers precise handling, traction control, and a powerful engine. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 boasts a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, excellent electronic helpers, and a great price/performance ratio. The BMW is also known for its fast and comfortable performance on both racetracks and country roads.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM's main drawback is its high price, while the BMW's engine running can be slightly rough. The BMW's dynamic suspension control (DDC) system is also on the "hard" side overall, and the seat height may be relatively high for some riders. Additionally, the design of the BMW is subjective and may be a matter of personal taste.

In conclusion, both the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are powerful and exhilarating naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers precise handling and a powerful engine, while the BMW excels in terms of sporty chassis, power, and electronic assistance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore108 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power173 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque144 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.2 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)189 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

With all the power and hard "Beast videos" from KTM, this horsepower monster is actually a 100% everyday bike for touring or going to work.

precise handling

traction control

powerful engine

High price

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 140 days for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R was published on 08/11/2012 and now has more than 4,900 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH