BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs. BMW F 900 XR 2021

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

BMW F 900 XR 2021

BMW F 900 XR 2021

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1200 GS 2016 vs BMW F 900 XR 2021

The BMW R 1200 GS model year 2016 and the BMW F 900 XR model year 2021 are both motorcycles produced by BMW, but they have several differences in terms of technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine and drive train, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is equipped with a Boxer engine, while the BMW F 900 XR 2021 has an in-line engine. The R 1200 GS has a larger bore of 101 mm compared to the F 900 XR's 86 mm, indicating a potentially more powerful engine. The stroke of the R 1200 GS is 73 mm, while the F 900 XR has a stroke of 77 mm. The R 1200 GS has a higher engine power of 125 HP compared to the F 900 XR's 105 HP. The torque of the R 1200 GS is also higher at 125 Nm, while the F 900 XR has a torque of 92 Nm. The R 1200 GS has a transmission system with a prop shaft, while the F 900 XR uses a chain. Both motorcycles have 2 cylinders and a 4-stroke engine, but the R 1200 GS has a larger displacement of 1170 ccm compared to the F 900 XR's 895 ccm.

In terms of suspension, the R 1200 GS has a front suspension with a strut design, while the F 900 XR has an upside-down telescopic fork. The rear suspension of the R 1200 GS is a single swing arm, while the F 900 XR has a swing arm suspension. Both motorcycles have preload adjustment, but the F 900 XR also has rebound adjustment.

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

In terms of chassis, both motorcycles have a steel frame with a twin tube design that serves as a load-bearing engine.

Both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front, providing strong stopping power.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the R 1200 GS has a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 19 inches, while the F 900 XR has a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width of the R 1200 GS is 170 mm with a diameter of 17 inches, while the F 900 XR has a rear tire width of 180 mm with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase of the R 1200 GS is 1507 mm, slightly shorter than the F 900 XR's 1518 mm. The seat height of the R 1200 GS is 850 mm, while the F 900 XR has a lower seat height of 815 mm. The kerb weight of the R 1200 GS is 238 kg with ABS, while the F 900 XR weighs 211 kg with ABS. The fuel tank capacity of the R 1200 GS is 20 liters, while the F 900 XR has a slightly smaller capacity of 15.5 liters.

BMW F 900 XR 2021

BMW F 900 XR 2021

In terms of strengths, the R 1200 GS 2016 is known for its powerful engine, low consumption, comfortable seating position, and its ability to be used off-road. It also has a high reputation in the motorcycle community. On the other hand, the F 900 XR 2021 is praised for its clean engine response, easy handling, stable ride feel, great connectivity, and high lean angle clearance. It also has a cool look and a great display. The F 900 XR is also noted for its good brakes and easy maneuverability.

However, both motorcycles also have their weaknesses. The R 1200 GS has a long and expensive surcharge side, and its Telelever front suspension may take some getting used to. The brakes of the R 1200 GS are known to be very sharp. The F 900 XR has a hard seat, and its gearbox, including the tough quickshifter, can be somewhat doughy. Some riders also feel that the F 900 XR's engine could have more power.

In conclusion, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and the BMW F 900 XR 2021 have different technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses. The R 1200 GS has a more powerful engine and is capable of off-road use, while the F 900 XR offers a clean engine response and easy handling. Both motorcycles have their own unique features and characteristics that may appeal to different riders based on their preferences and riding style.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 GS 2016 compared to BMW F 900 XR 2021

BMW R 1200 GS 2016
BMW F 900 XR 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore86 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power125 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,700 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque125 NmTorque92 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio13.1
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
Can be restricted for A2 licenceCan be restricted for A2 licenceYesCan be restricted for A2 licenceYes
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement895 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionStrutFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreloadAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width170 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,207 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth953 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,507 mmWheelbase1,518 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)238 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2016

A GS is at home almost anywhere - but only to a limited extent on the racetrack. It's a pleasure to feel the power of the partially water-cooled boxer twin cylinder on the exit of the bend - 125 hp only seems much weaker on paper than 150 or even 160 hp on the competition. With 125 Newton metres of torque, the acceleration from the bottom is superb anyway and the GS, at 238 kilos ready to ride, does not carry too much flab despite its bulky appearance. In very tight corners, the low centre of gravity also has a positive effect - the BMW R 1200 GS is very hard to crack! Even the front telelever suspension, which suppresses the front wheel's tendency to sink in under braking, fits perfectly into the GS's overall package and only slightly detracts from its sporty character.

powerful engine

low consumption

comfortable seating position

can also be used off-road

high reputation

Long and expensive surcharge side

Telelever front suspension takes some getting used to

Brake very sharp.

BMW F 900 XR 2021

BMW F 900 XR 2021

A motorbike in this performance class probably cannot be more accessible. The XR wobbles playfully through the radii and immediately inspires confidence in the saddle. Even long tours are easy and you are always relaxed when getting out of the saddle. However, the sporty look of the BMW also awakens desires for a little thrill. However, the power unit cannot quite fulfil these desires. The engine, transmission and quickshifter are a little too tame overall and could do with a little more sportiness.

Clean engine response

Very easy to ride bike

Cool looks, Great display

Good brakes

Easy handling

Stable ride feel

Great connectivity

High lean angle clearance

Well tuned ABS

Easy to manoeuvre

Hard seat

somewhat doughy gearbox including tough quickshifter

engine could do with more pepper

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 GS vs BMW F 900 XR

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 GS 2016 and a BMW F 900 XR 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is about 25% higher. A BMW R 1200 GS 2016 experiences a loss of 420 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 490 GBP for a BMW F 900 XR 2021. Compared to BMW F 900 XR 2021 there are more BMW R 1200 GS 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 47 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 GS with 70 days compared to 74 days for a BMW F 900 XR. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS and 23 reviews for the BMW F 900 XR since model year 2020. The first review for the BMW R 1200 GS was published on 20/01/2004 and now has more than 19,100 views. This compares to more than 136,400 views for the first review on BMW F 900 XR published on 05/11/2019.

Price BMW R 1200 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 900 XR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH