BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2021 vs Kawasaki Z900 2020

The BMW S 1000 R 2021 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line four-cylinders, and liquid cooling systems. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 comes out on top with 165 HP, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 falls slightly behind with 125.4 HP. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed.

When it comes to torque, the BMW also has the upper hand with 114 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 98.6 Nm. This means that the BMW will have better low-end power and acceleration.

Both bikes feature fuel injection systems and have four cylinders, ensuring smooth and efficient power delivery. The BMW has a slightly larger displacement at 999 ccm, while the Kawasaki has a displacement of 948 ccm.

BMW S 1000 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions at the rear. However, the BMW offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension. The Kawasaki only offers preload and rebound adjustments for its suspension.

When it comes to the chassis, the BMW features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, which provides a good balance between rigidity and weight. On the other hand, the Kawasaki has a steel frame with a double cradle design, which may not be as lightweight as the aluminum frame but still offers good stability.

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. However, the BMW has larger diameter discs at 320 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 300 mm. The BMW also utilizes radial technology for its brakes, which provides better braking performance and feel.

In terms of rider assistance systems, both bikes feature ABS and traction control. However, the BMW offers more advanced rider assistance systems such as hill start assist, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, and anti-wheelie control. The Kawasaki only offers riding modes and ride by wire.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also share the same wheelbase at 1450 mm. However, the BMW has a slightly higher seat height at 830 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. The BMW is also lighter with a kerb weight of 199 kg, while the Kawasaki weighs 210 kg.

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 is praised for its powerful engine, good brakes, comfortable ergonomics, and high-performance optional extras. It is also considered a great all-rounder. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 is praised for its powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 is criticized for its quickshifter not being perfect and its sound being somewhat intrusive. It also experiences vibrations in the handlebars. The Kawasaki Z900 2020 is criticized for its somewhat tiring menu navigation and the absence of a quickshifter option.

Overall, the BMW S 1000 R 2021 offers a more powerful and technologically advanced package, making it a top choice for riders seeking high performance and advanced features. However, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 provides good value for money and a strong overall package with its powerful engine and great handling.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2021 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2021
Kawasaki Z900 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore48 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHC, Drag leverValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel140 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake66 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail96.3 mmTrail105 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth820 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2021

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Kawasaki Z900 may not be up to scratch when it comes to modern, lean angle-dependent electronic features, but it's relatively cheap and you shouldn't underestimate the fan base of the good old inline four - the Z900 is one of the cheapest ways to own such a great engine with just under a litre of displacement in a sporty naked bike! The higher weight is noticeable, but not massively annoying, because the handling and stability are quite alright. In terms of "outdated" electronics, the most annoying thing is the missing shift assistant, which is not even available as an option. Overall, however, the Z900 is a great naked bike with a great price-performance ratio.

Light and natural handling with high stability

silky engine with full pull from low revs

high chassis transparency, great feedback

seating position with feel-good factor

absolutely fair price.

Relatively cumbersome operation of the menu

no slope-dependent assistance systems

high weight

Price Comparison Average Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2021 and a Kawasaki Z900 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2021 is about 89% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 34. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 67 days compared to 124 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons