Yamaha XSR700 2022 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2022

Yamaha XSR700 2022

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR700 2022 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017

When comparing the Yamaha XSR700 2022 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017, it is clear that both models have their own strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the Yamaha XSR700 2022, it boasts a successful design that combines retro elements with modern features. It is equipped with the proven CP2 engine, which delivers a respectable power output of 73.4 HP and a torque of 67 Nm. The fuel system is injection-based, ensuring efficient performance. The bike features a 2-cylinder engine and is cooled by a liquid cooling system. With a displacement of 689 ccm, it offers a good balance of power and agility.

In terms of suspension, the XSR700 2022 is equipped with a telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The frame is made of steel, providing a sturdy and reliable structure. The braking system consists of double disks at the front with a diameter of 298 mm. Additionally, the bike is equipped with ABS, which enhances safety and control.

Yamaha XSR700 2022

Yamaha XSR700 2022

The dimensions and weights of the XSR700 2022 include a front tire width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 180 mm and the same diameter. The wheelbase measures 1405 mm, providing stability and maneuverability. The seat height is 835 mm, accommodating riders of different heights. With a kerb weight of 188 kg (with ABS) and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, the bike strikes a good balance between agility and fuel efficiency.

Moving on to the Yamaha MT-09 2017, it offers some notable advantages over the XSR700. The engine type is also in line, but it delivers a higher power output of 115 HP and a torque of 87.5 Nm. The fuel system is injection-based, similar to the XSR700, and it features a 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847 ccm. The cooling system is also liquid-based.

In terms of suspension, the MT-09 2017 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The frame is made of aluminum, which provides a lightweight and agile structure. The braking system consists of double disks at the front with a diameter of 298 mm. Additionally, the bike is equipped with ABS, quickshifter, and traction control, offering advanced rider assistance systems for enhanced safety and performance.

The dimensions and weights of the MT-09 2017 include the same front and rear tire specifications as the XSR700. However, the wheelbase is slightly longer at 1440 mm, providing increased stability. The seat height is slightly lower at 815 mm, catering to riders who prefer a lower seating position. With a kerb weight of 193 kg (with ABS) and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters, the bike is slightly heavier than the XSR700.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In terms of strengths, the XSR700 2022 is praised for its successful design, proven CP2 engine, comfortable seating position, and versatility for various road conditions. On the other hand, the MT-09 2017 offers additional strengths such as Öhlins suspension, improved optics and sound with Akrapovic, a divine Magura HC3 radial brake pump, and grandiose optics with Carbon2Race covers.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The XSR700 2022 has a difficult-to-read display, a relatively soft chassis, and limited lean angle clearance. The MT-09 2017 requires a higher financial outlay and more working time, certain parts must be registered, and the ECU Flash is not road legal.

In conclusion, while the Yamaha XSR700 2022 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses, they both offer impressive performance and features that cater to different rider preferences.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR700 2022 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha XSR700 2022
Yamaha MT-09 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke68.6 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power73.4 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque67 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement689 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel130 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
RakeRake65.5 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail90 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,130 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)188 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)193 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR700 2022

Yamaha XSR700 2022

Can do everything but nothing well? A clear NO! The lively and agile retro bike with a sufficiently powerful engine can be a good all-rounder, which also looks good and tempts you to heat up the curves. Overall, the bike is fantastically manageable and sporty for me, even as a woman. The engine works better than expected and the seating position is more than comfortable. However, there is still room for improvement in terms of lean angle. I think that many people will continue to choose this bike because you simply can't go far wrong.

successful design

proven CP2 engine

comfortable seating position

an all-rounder suitable for every situation on the road

Display difficult to read

Relatively soft chassis

Rather little lean angle clearance

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR700 vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR700 2022 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2017 is about 6% higher. A Yamaha XSR700 2022 experiences a loss of 370 GBP in one year of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 820 GBP for a Yamaha MT-09 2017. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017 there are more Yamaha XSR700 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 92 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 146 days for the Yamaha XSR700. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 26 reviews for the Yamaha XSR700 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha XSR700 was published on 22/07/2015 and now has more than 13,700 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.

Price Yamaha XSR700

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH