Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs Kawasaki Z1000 2013

The Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line four-cylinder engines with liquid cooling. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Z1000 2013 has a slight advantage with 138 HP compared to the Z900 2017's 125.4 HP. The Z1000 also has a higher torque of 110 Nm compared to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. This means that the Z1000 may have slightly better acceleration and top speed compared to the Z900.

Both bikes have a double cradle frame, but the Z900 2017 has a steel frame while the Z1000 2013 has an aluminum frame. This could result in a difference in weight and handling characteristics. The Z900's steel frame may provide a more stable and comfortable ride, while the Z1000's aluminum frame could offer better agility and responsiveness.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Z900 2017 only has preload and rebound adjustment, while the Z1000 2013 has additional compression adjustment. This means that the Z1000 may offer more customizable suspension settings for different riding conditions.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. The Z900 2017 has petal technology, while the Z1000 2013 has radial petal technology. This could result in slightly different braking performance, with the Z1000 potentially offering better stopping power and heat dissipation.

In terms of tire dimensions, the Z900 2017 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm. The Z1000 2013 has a slightly wider rear tire with a width of 190 mm. This could result in slightly different handling characteristics, with the Z1000 potentially offering better grip and stability in corners.

The wheelbase of the Z900 2017 is slightly longer at 1450 mm compared to the Z1000 2013's 1440 mm. This could result in slightly better stability and straight-line performance for the Z900.

In terms of seat height, the Z900 2017 has a lower seat height of 795 mm compared to the Z1000 2013's 815 mm. This could make the Z900 more accessible to shorter riders.

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

In terms of strengths, the Z900 2017 has an ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a responsive engine with well-balanced torque. It is also considered to offer a good balance between performance, price, and practicality.

The Z1000 2013, on the other hand, is praised for its powerful engine, rich sound, and unique design.

In terms of weaknesses, the Z900 2017 has a narrow knee angle that may be uncomfortable for taller riders. The Z1000 2013 lacks traction control and has been described as having a nervous chassis.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers a well-rounded package with its chassis, looks, and engine performance, while the Z1000 boasts a powerful engine and unique design. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2017 compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z900 2017
Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power138 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,600 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque110 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque7,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement1,043 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountdirect
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Petal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth805 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height815 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

All in all, the new Z1000 is a successful further development of its predecessor. The lack of traction control is more of a marketing problem than a problem for end customers.

Powerful engine

rich sound

unique design

No traction control

nervous chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Kawasaki Z1000

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2017 and a Kawasaki Z1000 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2017 is about 8% higher. A Kawasaki Z900 2017 experiences a loss of 530 GBP in one year and 930 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 740 GBP and 740 GBP for a Kawasaki Z1000 2013. Compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2013 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 43 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z1000 with 69 days compared to 85 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 41 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 5,800 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z1000 published on 02/09/2002.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH